• Crawford v. New Castle County Hous. Auth., Section 8

    Publication Date: 2019-09-04
    Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Roberta Crawford, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Colleen K. Norris and Mary A. Jacobson, New Castle County Law Department, New Castle, DE, Barry M. Willoughby and Laure Elizabeth Moak Russell, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D68688

    Termination of Section 8 housing voucher proper where it was not based on a policy or custom leading to a constitutional violation and where recipient had apparent actual notice of the termination hearing.

  • Fo2GO LLC v. KeepItSafe, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-05-01
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stamatios Stamoulis, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE; David R. Bennett, Direction IP Law, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Melanie K. Sharp, James L. Higgins, and Michelle M. Ovanesian, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Guy Ruttenberg and Michael Eshaghian, Ruttenberg IP Law, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, for defendant.

    Case Number: D68542

    Dismissal of direct, contributory, and induced infringement claims denied to the extent plaintiff alleged defendant provided its employees with all the components of the infringing system and that it provided defendant's parent with notice of infringement in plaintiff's original complaint against the parent.

  • Heritage Handoff Holdings, LLC v. Fontanella

    Publication Date: 2019-03-20
    Practice Area: Business Torts | Securities Litigation
    Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John A. Sensing, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dylan P. Kletter and Kelsey D. Bond, Brown Rudnick LLP, Hartford, CT for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Dominick T. Gattuso and Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Marc J. Kurzman; Peter M. Nolin and Damian K. Gunningsmith, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, Stamford, CT and New Haven, CT for defendant.

    Case Number: D68501

    Purchaser was entitled to recover on its securities fraud claim based on evidence of misrepresentations and omissions, but its common law fraud claim was precluded by the bootstrapping doctrine.

  • Baggage Airline Guest Serv., Inc. v. Roadie, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-23
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Neal Belgam and Eve Ormerod, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefan V. Stein, Mayanne Downs, Jason Zimmerman and Cole Carlson, Gray Robinson P.A., Orlando, FL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward A. Pennington, John P. Moy, John P. Pen-nington and Darlene K. Tzou, Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: D68434

    Patent claims for a baggage delivery system involved an abstract idea and did not contain any inventive concept.

  • Drummond v. Amazon.com

    Publication Date: 2018-11-14
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Labor Law
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tia Drummond, Newark, DE, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: Justin K. Victor of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorney for defendant.

    Case Number: D68350

    Hostile work environment claim dismissed where plaintiff failed to establish how two alleged incidents were connected to her gender or race, where those incidents were not severe or pervasive, and where employer provided plaintiff with means to report such incidents and took remedial action in response to plaintiff's reports.

  • United States of America v. Gibson

    Publication Date: 2018-09-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert F. Kravetz, Lesley F. Wolf and Jamie M. McCall for the government
    for defendant: John S. Malik, Keneth M. Breen and John P. Nowak for defendant Gibson; Michael P. Kelly, Steven P. Wood, Geoffrey N. Rosamond and Andrew M. Lawler for defendant Harra; David Wilks, R. Stokes Nolte, Andrea S. Brooks and Thomas A. Foley for defendant North; Bartholomew J. Dalton, Ipek K. Medford, Andrew C. Dalton, Henry Klingeman and Helen Nau for defendant Rakowski.

    Case Number: D68293

    Sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict that defendants violated various banking and securities laws.

  • Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-09-12
    Practice Area: Expert Witnesses | Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
    Industry: E-Commerce | Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Aaron M. Frankel, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo, Gino Cheng, David K. Lin, Joe S. Netikosol, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA; David P. Enzminger, Louis L. Campbell, Winston & Strawn LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Dan K. Webb, Kathleen B. Barry, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL; Krista M. Enns, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michael M. Murray, Anup K. Misra, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY; Andrew R. Sommer, Thomas M. Dunham, Michael Woods, Paul N. Harold, Joseph S. Masullo, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for defendants.

    Case Number: D68278

    Defendant granted summary judgment of non-infringement where sale of game software did not amount to "making, using, or selling" accused game network.

  • In The Interest Of R. S. T., a child.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-01
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
    Judge: Judge McMillian
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark Jeffrey (Attorney at Law), Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Christopher Carr (Attorney General), Atlanta; Penny Hannah (Assistant Attorney General), Atlanta; Shalen Nelson (Senior Assistant Attorney General), Atlanta, for appellant. William Collins (Smith, Collins & Fletcher, P.A.), Atlanta; Nigel Davis (Attorney at Law), Atlanta; Karen Pulliam (Guardian Ad Litem), Decatur, for other party.

    Case Number: A17A1595

    Termination of Parental Rights Not Supported By Clear and Convincing Evidence of Harm to Child

  • April 3, 2018 | Law.com

    Alexa, Rule These Patent Ineligible | Plus, a Look at WesternGeco's Reach

    Amazon's success invalidating voice recognition patents isn't an open-and-shut win. Here's why.

    1 minute read

  • In The Interest Of J. N., A Child.

    Publication Date: 2018-03-01
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
    Judge: Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Aaron O'Brien (Thompson O'Brien), Norcross, for appellant.
    for defendant: Tara-Anne Canada (Guardian Ad Litem/Attorney), Lawrenceville; Deana Spencer (Spencer Law, LLC), Lawrenceville, for appellee. Christopher Carr (Attorney General), Atlanta; Penny Hannah (Assistant Attorney General), Atlanta; Shalen Nelson (Senior Assistant Attorney General), Atlanta; Debra Hale (Attorney at Law), Lawrenceville; Kristin Jahn (Special Assistant Attorney General), Atlanta, for other party.

    Case Number: A18A0256

    The trial court erred in granting a child's Guardian Ad Litem a blanket protective order over the GAL's entire file in a dependency action without considering the contents of the file.