• October 17, 2022 | New York Law Journal

    'Relentless': Ex-K&L Gates Partner Found Guilty of Cyberstalking Colleagues

    Each of the three counts of cyberstalking carries a maximum five-year sentence, though judges rarely impose the top sentence prescribed by statute.

    2 minute read

  • August 16, 2022 | Law.com

    Who Got the Work?℠: Amazon's iRobot Deal Draws Big Law and More

    Welcome to "Who Got the Work?℠," a regular column that highlights the law firms and lawyers around the country who are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.

    11 minute read

  • February 21, 2022 | Law.com

    Who Got the Work?℠: Skadden Reps Spotify in Acquisitions, Morgan Lewis Defends Southwest Airlines and More

    Welcome to "Who Got the Work?℠," a weekly column that highlights the law firms and lawyers around the country who are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.

    10 minute read

  • April 19, 2021 | New York Law Journal

    Thorny Issues Raised by Third-Party Discovery in Arbitration

    In this edition of their Southern District Civil Practice Roundup, Edward M. Spiro and Christopher B. Harwood discuss the nuanced analysis of third-party discovery issues in 'Broumand v. Joseph', a subpoena enforcement proceeding where the out-of-state respondents successfully resisted arbitral subpoenas.

    1 minute read

  • In Re Actos End-Payor Antitrust Litigation, 15-3364

    Publication Date: 2017-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Jacobs and Livingston, C.JJ., and Rakoff, D.J.1
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Jayne A. Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Weston, FL; Kenneth A. Wexler, Wexler Wallace LLP, Chicago, IL, on the brief, Steve D. Shadowen, Hilliard & Shadowen LLP, Austin, TX.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Blanca F. Young, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA; Jeffrey I. Weinberger, Adam R. Lawton, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, on the brief, Rohit K. Singla, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA. For amicus curiae Direct Purchasers in support of no party: Thomas M. Sobol, Davis S. Nalven, Gregory T. Arnold, Kristen A. Johnson, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Cambridge, MA; Linda P. Nussbaum, Bradley J. Demuth, Nussbaum Law Group, P.C., New York, NY.

    Case Number: 15-3364

    Cite as: In Re Actos End-Payor Ant Litigation, 15-3364, NYLJ 1202779289321, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided February 8, 2017) CASENAME In Re Actos End-Payor Ant

  • In Re Actos End-Payor Antitrust Litigation

    Publication Date: 2017-02-09
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property | Antitrust
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Jacobs and Livingston, C.JJ., and Rakoff, D.J.1
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Jayne A. Goldstein, Pomerantz LLP, Weston, FL; Kenneth A. Wexler, Wexler Wallace LLP, Chicago, IL, on the brief, Steve D. Shadowen, Hilliard & Shadowen LLP, Austin, TX.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Blanca F. Young, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA; Jeffrey I. Weinberger, Adam R. Lawton, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, on the brief, Rohit K. Singla, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA. For amicus curiae Direct Purchasers in support of no party: Thomas M. Sobol, Davis S. Nalven, Gregory T. Arnold, Kristen A. Johnson, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Cambridge, MA; Linda P. Nussbaum, Bradley J. Demuth, Nussbaum Law Group, P.C., New York, NY.

    Case Number: 15-3364

    Cite as: UFCW Local 1776 v. Takeda America Holdings, 15-3364, NYLJ 1202778806810, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided February 8, 2017) CASE NAME United Food and Commercial W

  • March 17, 2016 | New York Law Journal

    Does New York Banking Law §200(3) Undo 'Daimler'?

    Over 130 foreign banks maintain New York branches, agencies or representative offices, registered with the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS).1 These banks' prese

    1 minute read

  • February 25, 2016 | New York Law Journal

    Questions on Use of Compelled Testimony in LIBOR Convictions

    The government can breathe a sigh of relief following this month's ruling by Judge Jed S. Rakoff that its recently secured convictions of a pair of LIBOR traders will not be dismissed on

    1 minute read

  • November 13, 2015 | New York Law Journal

    Cross-Border Investigations and the Fifth Amendment

    Last week, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, a jury found two former Rabobank traders, Anthony Conti and Anthony Allen, guilty of wire fraud and conspiracy fo

    1 minute read

  • November 12, 2015 | New York Law Journal

    Cross-Border Investigations and the Fifth Amendment

    Marc P. Berger and Justin Florence write that the guilty verdicts for two former Rabobank traders last week marked the DOJ's first successful prosecution of individuals in connection with the LIBOR scandal, but Judge Jed. S. Rakoff, who presided over the trial, will now confront a critical post-trial question: Under 'Kastigar v. United States', can the government rely on a witness whose testimony has been affected by exposure to a defendant's involuntary statements that were compelled by a foreign government?

    1 minute read