Filter This View

  • Ritchie Multi-Strategy Global, LLC v. Huizenga Managers Fund, LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-01-30
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Johnston
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John A. Sensing and Ryan C. Cicoski for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Steven L. Caponi and Matthew B. Goeller, K&L Gates, LLP; Christopher J. Barber, Williams Montgom-ery & John Ltd. for defendant.
    Case Number: D68443

    A stay of this Delaware proceeding was appropriate where an action in another state involving the same parties and operative facts was not yet final.

  • Girardot v. The Chemours Co.

    Publication Date: 2018-04-11
    Practice Area: Class Actions | Employment Litigation
    Industry: Chemicals and Materials
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Johnston
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert K. Beste and Jonathan Landesman for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Stephanie E. O'Byrne and Kathleen Furey McDonough for defendant.
    Case Number: D68105

    Plaintiffs in this class action matter were entitled to pursue recovery of severance pay under state wage law, and their claims were filed within the statute of limitations.

  • Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Union Pac. Corp.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-29
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Environmental Law
    Industry: Transportation
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Johnston
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard L. Renck, Christopher M. Winter, and Mackenzie M. Wrobel, Duane Morris LLP; Paul L. Feldman, Gary S. Matsko, and Christopher J. Marino, Davis Malm & D'Agostine, P.C., attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Ann L. Al-Bahish and Lauren K. Valastro, Kelley Drye/Jackson Gilmour & Dobbs; Norton A. Colvin and Mitchell C. Chaney, Colvin, Chaney, Saenz & Rodriguez, LLP; Stephen B. Brauerman and Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A.; James W. Semple, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D67951

    Defendant not entitled to new trial where jury verdict not against great weight of evidence, as jury accepted, in part, defendants argument that plaintiffs costs were unreasonable, by reducing the amount of damages plaintiff sought.