Search Results

C.B. v. S.C.K.

Publication Date: 2022-05-06
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: A-3038-20

Plaintiff appealed from the denial of her request for a FRO and dismissal of her TRO.

A-5151-17; A-1083-18

Publication Date: 2021-03-15
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Sabatino
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Maha M. Kabbash (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP, Stephen D. Brody (O'Melveny & Myers, LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice and Jason Zarrow (O'Melveny & Myers, LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys; Stephen D. Brody, and Jason Zarrow, of counsel; Kelly S. Crawford, on the briefs); David R. Kott (McCarter & English, LLP, Reed Smith LLP, Lori G. Cohen (Greenberg Traurig, LLP) of the Georgia bar, admitted pro hac vice, R. Clifton Merrell (Greenberg Traurig, LLP) of the Georgia bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Sean P. Jessee (Greenberg Traurig, LLP), of the Georgia bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys; David J. Cooner and David R. Kott, of counsel and on the brief; Natalie H. Mantell and Steven H. Del Mauro, on the brief)
for defendant: Adam M. Slater (Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC, attorneys; Adam M. Slater, of counsel and on the brief; David M. Estes and Christopher J. Geddis, on the briefs)
Case Number: A-5151-17; A-1083-18

Trial Court Erroneously Excluded Evidence of FDA Certification, Which Had the Effect of Supporting Punitive Damages Verdict in Product Liability Actions

Hrymoc v. Ethicon, Inc.

Publication Date: 2021-03-02
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Sabatino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: A-1083-18

Defendants appealed from the jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs in their separate product liability actions arising from injuries allegedly caused by pelvic mesh devices designed and manufactured by the respective defendants that were surgically implanted into plaintiffs and later caused severe adverse complications.

State v. Gerena

Publication Date: 2021-01-18
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Sabatino
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender (Melanie K. Dellplain, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the briefs)
for defendant: Esther Suarez, Hudson County Prosecutor (Ednin D. Martinez, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief)
Case Number: A-3655-18T2

Lay Opinion Testimony Regarding Perception of Victim's Age Admissible After Consideration of Factors Establishing Reliability of Such Perception

July 22, 2019 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Grewal v. Atl. Coast House Lifting

A New Jersey appellate court has ruled that the state may proceed with a consumer fraud action against a Superstorm Sandy contractor – and that consumers…

1 minute read

April 3, 2019 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Mar. Park v. Nova Cas. Co.

This case discusses coverage for civil authority when a restaurant was closed by order of New Jersey officials.

1 minute read

December 1, 2016 | New Jersey Law Journal

N.J. Div. of Child Prot. and Permanency v. G.S.

No. A-5222-15T2 & A-5523-15T2 Nov. 22, 2016 (DATE DECIDED) Judge Sabatino FOR APPELLANTS: T. Gary Mitchell, Deputy Public Defender (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defende

1 minute read

January 29, 2015 | New Jersey Law Journal

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 24, No. 18 - January 29, 2015

STATE COURT CASES FAMILY LAW 20-2-5647 K.M. v. J.P.C., App. Div. (per curiam) (7 pp.) Defendan

1 minute read

January 29, 2015 | New Jersey Law Journal

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 24, No. 18 - January 29, 2015

Daily decision alert.

1 minute read

December 9, 2014 |

Bldg. Materials Corp. of Am. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  Bldg. Materials Corp. of Am. v. Allstate Ins. Co.424 N.J.Super. 448Superior Court of New Jersey,Appellate…

1 minute read