• IP Network Solutions, Inc. v. Nutanix, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2022-02-22
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Wallace
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nicholas T. Verna, Womble Bond Dickinson LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Justin M Forcier, Brian M. Rostocki, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D69719

    The court held that neither party demonstrated that its reading of the contested operable language of the relevant agreement represented the only reasonable construction as a matter of law.

  • IDT Corp. v. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2019-02-27
    Practice Area: Insurance Litigation | Telecommunications
    Industry: Insurance | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Wallace
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian M. Rostocki and Benjamin P. Chapple, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robin L. Cohen and Keith McKenna, McKool Smith, P.C., New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr. and David A. Bilson, Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A. Wilmington, DE; Alexander R. Karam and Addison Draper, Clyde & Co. US LLP, Washington, DC for U.S. Specialty Ins. Co.; Henry duPont Ridgely, John L. Reed, Ethan H. Townsend, Joseph G. Finnerty III, Megan Shea Harwick and Eric S. Connuck, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE and New York, NY for Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. Timothy Jay Houseal and Jennifer M. Kinkus, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Charles C. Lemley , Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC for XL Specialty Ins. Co.

    Case Number: D68474

    The court granted and denied portions of insurers' cross-motions for summary judgment regarding their duty to defend parties in an underlying shareholder action.

  • IDT Corp. v. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2019-02-13
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities | Insurance Litigation
    Industry: Insurance | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Wallace
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian M. Rostocki and Benjamin P. Chapple, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE, and Robin L. Cohen and Keith McKenna, McKool Smith, P.C., New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr. and David A. Bilson, Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Alexander R. Karam and Addison Draper, Clyde & Co US LLP, Washington, DC; Henry duPont Ridgely, John L. Reed, and Ethan H. Townsend, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph G. Finnerty III, Megan Shea Harwick, and Eric S. Connuck, DLA Piper, LLP, New York, NY; Timothy Jay Houseal and Jennifer M. Kinkus, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; and Charles C. Lemley, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.

    Case Number: D68455

    Insurers were granted partial summary judgment on insureds' declaratory judgment action for defense costs, where underlying action alleged individual defendant committed wrongful acts within scope of official capacity, but did not constitute securities claim because it was brought by shareholders of separate spin-off company.

  • Eminence Investors, L.L.L.P. v. Bank of New York Mellon

    Publication Date: 2015-04-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2015-04-02
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Anthony W. Ishii, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert Branch (argued), Thornton Law Group, P.C., Fresno, California; Douglas V. Thornton, Rummonds Thornton, LLP, Fresno, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: David J. Bird (argued), James C. Martin, Eric A. Schaffer, and Benjamin J. Sitter, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Donald H. Glasrud, Dietrich, Glasrud, Mallek & Aune, Fresno, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

    Case Number: No. 15-15237

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 3253 EMINENCE INVESTORS, L.L.L.P., an Arkansas Limited Liability Limited Partnership, Individually, and on behalf of all others si

  • Protectmarriage.com v. Bowen

    Publication Date: 2014-05-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-05-20
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr., Chief District Judge, Presiding Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Milan D. Smith, Jr. and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John C. Eastman (argued), Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Orange, California; James Bopp, Jr. (argued) and Richard E. Coleson, The Bopp Law Firm, Terre Haute, Indiana; Benjamin W. Bull, Alliance Defense Fund, Scottsdale, Arizona; David J. Hacker, Alliance Defense Fund, Folsom, California; Noel H. Johnson and Kaylan L. Phillips, ActRight Legal Foundation, Plainfield, Indiana, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: Mollie M. Lee (argued), Dennis J. Herrera, Therese M. Stewart, and Jon Givner, Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, California; Zackery P. Morazzini (argued) and Jack Woodside, Fair Political Practices Commission, Sacramento, California; Kamala D. Harris, Tamar Pachter, and Daniel J. Powell, Office of the Attorney General, San Francisco, California; Terence J. Cassidy and Kristina M. Hall, Porter Scott, Sacramento California, for Defendants-Appellees.

    Case Number: No. 11-17884

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 5478 PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL; NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA, Yes on 8, Spo

  • Haynes v. Quarterman

    Publication Date: 2009-03-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-10
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Dennis, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-70004

    Published opinionBefore JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.Petitioner Anthony Cardell Haynes ("Haynes"), a Texas prisoner, appeals the district court's decision to deny Haynes a petition

  • February 14, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    American Home Mortgage Corporation v. American Home Mortgage Corporation,

    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY — Trade-Name InfringementA-6339-00T5; Appellate Division; opinion by Hoens, J.A.D.; decided and approved for publication February 6, 200

    1 minute read

  • Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated

    Publication Date: 2012-04-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-16
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding Before: J. Clifford Wallace, John T. Noonan, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas G. Cotter, Stanley G. Feldman, and Stephen T. Portell; Haralson Miller, Pitt, Feldman & McAnally, P.L.C., Tucson, Arizona, for the plaintiffs-appellants
    for defendant: Michael K. Brown, Ginger F.H. Pigott, and Lisa M. Baird, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee.

    Case Number: No. 10-17755

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4069 RICHARD STENGEL; MARY LOU STENGEL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC INCORPORA

  • Randle v. Crawford

    Publication Date: 2010-05-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-25
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Franny A. Forsman, Federal Public Defender, and John C. Lambrose, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, and Dennis C. Wilson, Deputy Attorney General, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the respondents-appellees.

    Case Number: No. 08-15657

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 5823PATRICK H. RANDLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v.JACKIE CRAWFORD; NEVADA ATTORNEY GENER

  • Polimaster Ltd. v. RAE Systems, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-09-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Garden, Esq., Alexandria, Virginia, for appellants Polimaster Ltd., et al.
    for defendant: John P. Flynn, Esq., San Francisco, California, for appellee RAE Systems, Inc.

    Case Number: No. 08-15708 No. 09-15369

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 12585POLIMASTER LTD.; NA&SE TRADING CO., LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RAE SYSTEMS