Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
32,648 results for 'K///////////////////////////////////////////////// judge:"Justice"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-10-12
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Margo K. Brodie
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-CV-2956
Surinamese's Forced Labor, Trafficking Claims Survive Against Fish Market Defendants
Publication Date: 2022-10-12
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York
Judge: Justice Joel M. Cohen
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 651918/2012
Court Denies Both Parties' Motions for Post-Verdict Relief
Publication Date: 2022-10-12
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Westchester
Judge: Justice William J. Giacomo
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 50181/2020
Motion to Quash Non-Party Subpoena Denied When Testimony is Material to Defense
Publication Date: 2022-10-12
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William Van Hearnburg, Jr., Paula J. Frederick, Jenny K. Mittelman, William Dallas NeSmith, III, (State Bar of Georgia), Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: Joseph Arrington, II, Atlanta, for appellee; Thomas E. Cauthorn, III, (Cauthorn Nohr & Owen), Marietta, for other party.
Case Number: S22Y1106
Disbarment Warranted Based on Trust Account Violations and Failure to Participate in Disciplinary Process
Publication Date: 2022-10-11
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: DOCKET
Motions & Appeals List released on: October 6, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-10-11
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
Industry:
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Warren
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stanley W. Schoolcraft, III, (Office of the Public Defender), McDonough, for appellant.
for defendant: Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Paula Khristian Smith, Christopher M. Carr, Matthew Blackwell Crowder, (Department of Law), Atlanta, Fani T. Willis, Lyndsey Hurst Rudder, Richard Benjamin Caplan, Kevin Christopher Armstrong, (Fulton County District Attorney’s Office), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case Number: S22A0757
No Showing Made That Photo Lineup Was Unduly Suggestive or That Witness Was Under Influence of Drugs
Publication Date: 2022-10-11
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Federal Government | Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Laura Hatcher, Shamoor Anis, United States Attorney’s Office, Wilmington, DE; Brian Hanna, Jonathan Y. Mincer, Jenigh Garrett, Jill Ptacek, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack Blumenfeld, Brian Egan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lawrence Buterman, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Amanda Reeves, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC; Elyse M. Greenwald, Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Daniel K. Hogan, Daniel C. Kerrick, Hogan McDaniel, Wilmington, DE; Peter J. Schwingler, Stinson LLP, Minneapolis, MN; Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Amanda L. Wait, Vic Domen, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC; Darryl Wade Anderson, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Houston, TX; Christine A. Varney, David R. Marriott, Peter T. Parbur, Timothy G. Cameron, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: 21-1644 (MN)
Court denied a request by plaintiff to enjoin an acquisition of a sugar company the Government argued would result in a monopoly of the sugar market in the southeastern United States. The court reviewed evidence from trial noting that the markets for industrial consumers were different from retail consumers, thus broadening the base and the market. The court further found that plaintiff's argument was undermined by the fact that they control the sugar supply within the United States.
Publication Date: 2022-10-11
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk
Judge: Acting Justice Chris Ann Kelley
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Petitioner's counsel: Carolyn Hill, Esq., East Setauket, NY.
for defendant: Temporary Guardian: Vincent Messina, Esq., Messina, Perillo & Hill, LLP, Sayville, NY.
Counsel to AIP's husband: John Ray, Esq., Miller Place, NY.
Counsel to AIP: David Alamia, Esq., Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Central Islip, NY.
Court Evaluator: Dr. Lynn Schaefer, Ph.D., Woodbury, NY.
Case Number: 602552/2022
Court Determines Whether Abusive Husband Can Still Be Named Guardian at Wife's Request
October 10, 2022 | Law.com
An Arizona parental-rights attorney was suspended from practicing law for 90 days after practicing for several months with a previously suspended license because of unfulfilled continuing legal education obligations, in one instance forcing a "panicked" client to get new court-appointed counsel on the day of a juvenile-court severance trial.
6 minute read
October 10, 2022 | Connecticut Law Tribune
The Plyler decision is one of most inspiring and, at times, poetic opinions ever written. The court's discussion of the contradictions and complexities affecting the undocumented population in the U.S. was remarkably prescient.
6 minute read
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
