Filter This View

  • Glaubach v. Graubard Miller

    Publication Date: 2021-04-22
    Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York
    Judge: Justice Barry Ostrager
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff was represented by: Andrew Lavoott Bluestone, Esq.
    for defendant: Defendants and Relief Defendants were represented by: David F. Bayne, Esq. and Megan Admire, Esq., Akerman LLP.
    Case Number: 161605/2019

    Defendants' Documentary Evidence Sufficient to Refute Legal Malpractice Claims, Dismissed

  • Mohammed v. Juno Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-03-26
    Practice Area: Damages
    Industry: Transportation
    Court: Supreme Court, New York
    Judge: Justice Barry Ostrager
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiffs were represented by Philip M. Hines and Mohammed Gangat of Held & Hines LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Defendants Veta Junk, Juno, Inc. and T. Marco were represented by Jeffrey A. Kimmel and Paul J. Rutigliano of Akerman LLP, New York, NY.; Defendants TTGehaz, Juno USA LP, Vulcan Cars and GT Forge, Inc. were represented by Keara M. Gordon and Steven Rosato, DLA Piper
    Case Number: 656428/2017

    Rideshare Drivers That Promised Equity Sufficiently Alleged Claim for Unjust Enrichment

  • December 18, 2017 | New York Law Journal

    First and Second Departments Split on What Is Considered 'Documentary Evidence'

    Jordan M. Engelhardt and Muhammad U. Faridi write: The CPLR does not define the phrase “documentary evidence.” Commentators on the CPLR have attempted to fill the void by offering their own take on the issue. And the First and Second Departments have split on whether certain types of paper qualify as “documentary evidence.”

    1 minute read