• Candelario v. Bobst North America Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-09-05
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Products Liability
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, U.S. - WDNY
    Judge: District Judge Charles Siragusa
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Joseph A. Regan, Esq., Faraci & Lange LLP, Rochester, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant Bobst North America, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Bobst Champlain, Inc.: Matthew C. Lenahan, Esq., Rupp Baase Pfalzgraf & Cunningham LLC, Rochester, NY. Thomas R. Pender, Esq., Cremer Spina Shaughnessy Jansen & Siegert LLC, Chicago, IL. For Defendant Bobst Lyon, SAS f/k/a SA Martin: Thomas R. Pender, Esq., Cremer Spina Shaughnessy Jansen & Siegert LLC, Chicago, IL. For Third Party Plaintiff Bobst North America, Inc. as Successor in Interest to Bobst Champlain, Inc.: Matthew C. Lenahan, Esq., Rupp Baase Pfalzgraf & Cunningham LLC, Rochester, NY. Thomas R. Pender, Esq., Cremer Spina Shaughnessy Jansen & Siegert LLC, Chicago, IL. For Third Party Defendant Jamestown Container Corporation: No appearance.

    Case Number: 18-CV-6281

    Court Has Jurisdiction Over Box Machine's French Maker, Which Could Foresee Suit in N.Y.

  • July 15, 2019 | New York Law Journal

    On 'United States v. Haymond'

    It is time to come to the jury's rescue. Lofty rhetoric will not do.

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Haymond

    Publication Date: 2019-06-26
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Supreme Court
    Judge: Judge Gorsuch
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1672

    18 U.S.C. §3583(k) violates right to trial by jury by mandating imposition of minimum sentence based on findings of sentencing judge alone

  • June 13, 2019 | National Law Journal

    SCOTUS Financials: Gorsuch Snags $225K Advance for New Book, Roberts' Stock Sale, and Other Highlights

    Book royalties and teaching income continue to supplement what the U.S. Supreme Court justices are earning on the bench, according to newly released financial disclosure forms.

    1 minute read

  • June 1, 2018 | New Jersey Law Journal

    New Jersey's U.S. Supreme Court Victory for Legalized Sports Betting

    The 'Murphy' court's decision has potential far-reaching implications for not only sports betting and the gaming industry, but principles of federalism and the balance of power between the states and the federal government.

    1 minute read

  • Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman

    Publication Date: 2017-12-07
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, SECOND CIRCUIT
    Judge: Circuit Judge DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellees: For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Deepak Gupta, Jonathan E. Taylor, Gupta Wessler PLLC, Washington, DC. For amicus curiae Washington Legal Foundation, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Richard A. Samp, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, DC. For amici curiae United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, Inc., Consumer Action, and National Association of Consumer Advocates, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Sharon K. Robertson, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Appellants: For Eric T Schneiderman, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York: Judith Vale, Senior Assistant Solicitor General, Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Steven C. Wu, Deputy Solicitor General, New York, NY. For Cyrus R. Vance, in his official capacity as District Attorney of New York County, and Eric Gonzalez, in his official capacity as Acting District Attorney of Kings County: Kathy Chang Park, for Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY. For amicus curiae Public Good Law Center, in support of Defendants-Appellants: Seth E. Mermin, Thomas Bennigson, Public Good Law Center, Berkeley, CA.

    Case Number: 13-4533

    From SCOTUS to NY's Court of Appeals, Clarity Sought in Credit Card Fee Language Suit

  • March 29, 2017 | Delaware Business Court Insider

    Why Patent Ruling That 'Ignored' Supreme Court Precedent May Stand

    The justices have shown no great deference to the Federal Circuit in recent years. Yet, they sound reluctant to overrule a 1990 decision that led to a crush of filings in the Eastern District of

    1 minute read

  • March 27, 2017 | The Recorder

    Why Patent Ruling That 'Ignored' Supreme Court Precedent May Stand

    The justices have shown no great deference to the Federal Circuit in recent years. Yet, they sound reluctant to overrule a 1990 decision that led to a crush of filings in the Eastern District of

    1 minute read

  • March 27, 2017 | The Recorder

    Why Patent Ruling That 'Ignored' Supreme Court Precedent May Stand

    The justices have shown no great deference to the Federal Circuit in recent years. Yet, they sound reluctant to overrule a 1990 decision that led to a crush of filings in the Eastern District of

    1 minute read

  • December 14, 2016 |

    Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius

     Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus.v.SebeliusKeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative TreatmentDeclined to…

    1 minute read