Filter This View

  • September 29, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Former Fed General Counsel Joins Sullivan & Cromwell Sullivan & Cromwell has recruited as senior counsel a former chief lawyer for the Federal Reser

    1 minute read

  • May 9, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Paul Weiss Elects Brad Karp to Chairman Role Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison has elected Brad S. Karp its next chairman. Mr. Karp, the co-chai

    1 minute read

  • Samsun Logix Corp., Petitioner v. Bank of China, Respondent, 105262/10

    Publication Date: 2011-05-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 55
    Judge: Justice Jane S. Solomon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Petitioner was represented by Jeremy J.O, Harwood, Esq., of Blank Rome LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Respondents Bank of China, Bank of Communications Co., Ltd, China Construction Bank Corp, China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd., Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Agricultural Bank of China were represented by Dwight A. Healy, Esq., of White & Case LLP, Amici Curiae The Clearing House Association, LLC. The Institute of International Bankers were represented by Bruce E. Clark, Esq. of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY. Amicus Curiae The Federal Reserve Bank of New York was represented by Thomas C. Baxter, Jr. (Shari D. Leventhal, Esq. and Katherine S. Landy, Esq., of Counsel), New York, NY.
    Case Number: 105262/10

    Cite as: Samsun Logix Corp v. Bank of China, 105262/10, NYLJ 1202495318952, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided May 12, 2011)Justice Jane S. S

  • January 18, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Law Firm, E-Discovery Vendor Settle Lawsuits Almost as soon as it began, the legal battle between Sullivan & Cromwell and Electronic Evidence Discovery Inc. (EED) has ended

    1 minute read

  • May 22, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Stock Options Not 'Wages,' Court Rules

    Goldman Sachs is not required to honor the unvested stock options and unvested, contingent rights to restricted-stock units its former employee held at the time of his termination, the Appellate Di

    1 minute read

  • February 23, 2012 | New York Law Journal

    $3 Million Sanction Exceeded Arbitrator's Authority, Panel Says

    A state appeals panel has rejected an arbitrator's $3 million sanction against oil tycoon Jack Grynberg in a decade-long dispute with BP and Statoil, ruling that the arbitrator exceeded his a

    1 minute read

  • May 19, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Stock Options Not 'Wages,' Court Rules

    Goldman Sachs is not required to honor the unvested stock options and unvested, contingent rights to restricted-stock units its former employee held at the time of his termination, the Appella

    1 minute read

  • February 24, 2012 | New York Law Journal

    N.Y. panel rejects arbitrator's $3M sanction

    A New York state appeals panel has rejected an arbitrator's $3 million sanction against oil tycoon Jack Grynberg in a decade-long dispute with BP and Statoil, ruling that the arbitrator excee

    1 minute read

  • May 22, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Stock Options Not 'Wages,' Court Rules

    Goldman Sachs is not required to honor the unvested stock options and unvested, contingent rights to restricted-stock units its former employee held at the time of his termination, the Appellate Di

    1 minute read