Filter This View

  • In re R.H.

    Publication Date: 2002-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-02-21
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Nigro
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 96 M.D. Appeal D

    ARGUED: December 5, 2000OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURTIn this appeal, Appellant R.H., a minor, argues that the Superior Court improperly affirmed the order of the trial court denyi

  • Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    Publication Date: 2001-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-19
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 61 and 62 M

    ARGUED: December 4, 2000OPINIONThe issues presented in this appeal involve (1) the eligibility of a person involuntarily committed as a condition of probation for workers' compensation benefits

  • Commonwealth v. Samuels

    Publication Date: 2001-09-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-28
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Chief Justice Flaherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 91 M.D. Appeal D

    SUBMITTED: January 8, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTThis appeal from a conviction for homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence of alcohol raises the issue of the state of mind necessary t

  • Lewis v. Erie Insurance Exchange

    Publication Date: 2002-03-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-21
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Saylor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 6 WAP 2001

    Argued: September 11, 2001OPINIONThe question presented is whether technical requirements imposed upon insurers under the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act to effectuate a first named i

  • Commonwealth v. Andrews

    Publication Date: 2001-03-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-03-26
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Saylor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 53 E.D. App. Dkt

    [J-148-00]Argued: October 18, 2000OPINIONIn this case, we address the propriety of imposing separate consecutive sentences for multiple counts of criminal conspiracy and possessing an instrum