Filter This View

  • Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    Publication Date: 2001-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-19
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 61 and 62 M

    ARGUED: December 4, 2000OPINIONThe issues presented in this appeal involve (1) the eligibility of a person involuntarily committed as a condition of probation for workers' compensation benefits

  • Leonard v. Commonwealth

    Publication Date: 2001-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-22
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 8 M.D. App. Dkt.

    J-164-2000ARGUED: December 4, 2000OPINION OF THE COURTMR. CHIEF JUSTICE FLAHERTYThis is an appeal by allowance from an order of Commonwealth Court which affirmed an order of the Court of C

  • Schreffler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    Publication Date: 2002-01-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-18
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 104 MAP 2000

    ARGUED: April 30, 2001OPINION ANNOUNCING JUDGMENT OF THE COURTWe granted the petition for allowance of appeal to determine whether the Commonwealth Court erred in concluding that the claim petit

  • Mace v. Atlantic Refining & Marketing Corp.

    Publication Date: 2001-12-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-12-12
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Nigro.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 5 EAP 2000

    ARGUED: October 17, 2000OPINIONAppellee Bassam Barqawi, t/a A-Plus Mini Market, ("Barqawi") operated an A-Plus convenience store and gas station ("A-Plus") in Philadelphia pursuant to a franchis

  • April 4, 2001 | The Legal Intelligencer

    After Remand, Pennsylvania Supremes Affirm Landmark HMO Decision

    In a decision much-awaited by the public and health law community alike, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday affirmed its 1998 decision in Pappas v. Asbel, holding that a state

    1 minute read

  • April 17, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Plaintiffs Bar Slams Justices' Products Liability Ruling

    In the wake of the state Supreme Court's ruling that courts must consider a product's multiple uses when assessing that product's risk, some plaintiffs attorneys have criticized the decision,

    1 minute read

  • Baker v. A C and S, et al.

    Publication Date: 2000-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-06-26
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: CAPPY, SAYLOR, ZAPPALA and NEWMAN
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. J-12-2000

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. OPINIONMR. JUSTICE CAPPY The question at issue concerns which method of set-off applies in this strict liabilit

  • Lititz Mutual Insurance Co. v. Steely

    Publication Date: 2001-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-30
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Saylor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 116 MAP 2000, 11

    ARGUED: April 30, 2001OPINIONThe issue to be decided is whether a pollution exclusion clause in a commercial general liability insurance policy precludes coverage for injuries allegedly caused b

  • State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Craley

    Publication Date: 2001-09-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-09-26
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Joyce, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1117 MDA 2000

    BEFORE: DEL SOLE, P.J., CAVANAUGH, J., MCEWEN, P.J.E., JOHNSON, JOYCE, STEVENS, MUSMANNO, LALLY-GREEN, and TODD, JJ.OPINION� 1 In this declaratory judgment action, Appellant, State Farm Fire and

  • October 24, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Justices Agree to Hear Divisive Case on DUI

    The state Supreme Court is poised to resolve a dispute in the Commonwealth Court over how to handle the issue of when officers have authority to pull over drivers for suspected drunk driving

    1 minute read