Filter This View

  • United States v. Stitt

    Publication Date: 2001-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-25
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Williams, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-2

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 30, 2000Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Williams wrote the opinion, in which Judge Widener and Judge Motz joined.OPINIONRichard Thomas Stitt was convicted in

  • Hedges v. Obama, 12-3176

    Publication Date: 2013-07-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Kearse and Lohier, CJJ, and Kaplan, DJ.**
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees: Carl J. Mayer, Mayer Law Group LLC, New York, NY, Bruce I. Afran, Esq., Princeton, NJ.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants-Appellants: Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Washington, DC; Beth S. Brinkmann, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Washington, DC; August E. Flentje, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC; Jeh Charles Johnson, General Counsel, Department of Defense, Washington, DC; Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY; Benjamin H. Torrance, Christopher B. Harwood, Assistant United States Attorneys, New York, NY, on the brief, Robert M. Loeb, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Attorneys for Amici Curiae Senators John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Kelly Ayotte: Lee A. Casey, Andrew M. Grossman, on the brief David B. Rivkin, Jr. BakerHostetler LLP, Washington, DC. Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Bill of Rights Defense Committee: Kent A. Yalowitz, Arnold & Porter LLP, New York, NY; L. Charles Landgraf, Arpan A. Sura, Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC. Attorney for Amici Curiae Center for National Security Studies and The Constitution Project: Matthew J. MacLean, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC. Attorney for Amicus Curiae Government Accountability Project: Reem Salahi, Hadsell Stormer Richardson & Renick, LLP, Pasadena, CA. Attorneys for Amici Curiae Karen and Ken Korematsu, et al.: Eric K. Yamamoto, University of Hawaii School of Law, Honolulu, HI; Lorraine K. Bannai, Anjana Malhotra, Seattle University School of Law, Seattle, WA. Attorneys for Amicus Curiae the Rutherford Institute: John W. Whitehead, Douglas R. McKusick, Lina M. Ragep, The Rutherford Institute, Charlottesville, VA; Anand Agneshwar, Arnold & Porter LLP, New York, NY. Attorneys for Amici Curiae U.S. Congressman Steve Stockman, et al.: William J. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, John S. Miles, Jeremiah L. Morgan, Robert J. Olson, William J. Olson, P.C., Vienna, VA; Steven J. Harfenist, Friedman Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein LLP, Lake Success, NY; Gary G. Kreep, U.S. Justice Foundation, Ramona, CA.
    Case Number: 12-3176 (Lead)

    Cite as: Hedges v. Obama, 12-3176 (Lead), NYLJ 1202611414668, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided July 17, 2013) 12-3176 (Lead) Before: Kearse and Lohier, CJJ

  • Florida v. Jardines

    Publication Date: 2013-03-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-26
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-564

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3328FLORIDA, PETITIONERv.JOELIS JARDINESNo. 11-564p

  • Festa v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs

    Publication Date: 2006-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Michael Stallman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Stallman This action challenges the constitutiona

  • July 26, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    'Castle Rock v. Gonzales': Enforcing Orders of Protection

    Many advocates in the field of domestic violence are greatly concerned as a result of the recent 7-2 decision of June 27, 2005 of the U.S. Supreme Court in a href="http://a257.g.akamaitech

    1 minute read

  • December 11, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Public Interest Law

    Section 1983 authorizes private parties to enforce their federal constitutional rights against state and local officials and municipalities (a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42

    1 minute read

  • People v. Barrett

    Publication Date: 2012-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-30
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Laurence K. Sullivan, Dorian Jung, Seth K. Schalit and Lisa H. Ashley Ott, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Jean Matulis, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Deborah A. Dorfman and Sujatha Jagadeesh Branch for Disability Rights California, ARC of California, Capitol People First, Professor Robert Jacobs, Professor Michael Perlin and Olivia Raynor as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S180612

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 8538 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTINE BARRETT, Defendant and Appel

  • Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-05-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-05-22
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: REHNQUIST, O'CONNOR, BREYER, KENNEDY, SCALIA, STEVENS, SOUTER, THOMAS, and GINSBURG
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 98-1811

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court. This case focuses on the 1984 version of

  • Pegram et al. v. Herdrich

    Publication Date: 2000-06-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-06-12
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Souter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 98-1949

    Petitioners (collectively Carle) function as a health maintenance organization (HMO) owned by physicians providing prepaid medical services to participantswhose employers contract with Carle for co

  • Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports Authority

    Publication Date: 2002-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-28
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Thomas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-46

    535 U. S. ____ (2002)This case presents the question whether state sovereign immunity precludes petitioner Federal Maritime Commission (FMC or Commission) from adjudicating a private party's compla