Filter This View

  • Davis v. Stratton,

    Publication Date: 2008-09-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-10
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District
    Judge: Lawrence Kahn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Kahn MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER2 Pre

  • Roper v. Hynes, 05 Civ. 7664

    Publication Date: 2006-10-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-09-27
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: William Pauley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05 Civ. 7664

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK For Plaintiff: Ezra B. Glaser For Defendant: Edmonn F. Foley The New York City Law Dept. Monica Ann

  • January 30, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    The Inaugural Issue: January 1878

    The publisher wasn't convinced of the new journal's viability or profitability � even in the short term. Here are the editor's opening remarks, followed by a sampling of the first issue's c

    1 minute read

  • Attorney General of Canada v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-10-12
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Katzmann, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-7972

    As amended November 2, 2001.Argued: May 30, 2001Plaintiff-Appellant appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Thomas J. McAvoy, Chief Jud

  • February 1, 2007 | The American Lawyer

    PRO BONO SCORECARD 2007: Scoring the Firms

    Scoring the FirmsPurchase the Electronic 2007 A-List from ALM Resea

    1 minute read

  • Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

    Publication Date: 2010-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Marcia Hofmann, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.
    for defendant: Douglas N. Letter and Scott McIntosh, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellants.
    Case Number: No. 09-17235

    Cite as 09 C.D.O.S. 1796ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF N

  • Sanford v Colgate University

    Publication Date: 2007-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 501110

    Decided and Entered: January 11, 2007 501110 ________________________________ CHARLES H. SANFORD III et al., as Members of NEW YORK ZETA OF PHI DELTA THETA CORPORATION,

  • Academy of Skills & Knowledge Inc. v. Charter Schools USA Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-25
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 12
    Judge: Sam Griffith Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 12-07-00027-CV

    OPINIONAcademy of Skills & Knowledge, Inc. ("ASK") appeals following summary judgment proceedings and a jury trial in a civil lawsuit between ASK and Charter Schools, USA, Inc. ("CSUSA"). ASK r

  • Hom v. Brennan

    Publication Date: 2004-02-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York Judge Spatt The plaintiff George Hom (the "plaintiff" or "Hom"), proceeding pro se, commenced an action in the New Yor

  • Chapa v. Traciers & Associates, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-31
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Eva M. Guzman Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-07-00056-CV

    Affirmed and Opinion filed July 31, 2008.OPINIONIn this appeal, we must determine whether appellants, the parents of two young children, have legally cognizable claims for mental anguish alleged