• Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & Parr

    Publication Date: 2009-08-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-03
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2008-1229

    Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST.Touchcom, Inc. and Touchcom Technologies, I

  • Ultimax Cement Manufacturing Corp. v. CTS Cement Manufacturing Corp.

    Publication Date: 2009-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-12-03
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 2008-1218, -1439

    Published opinionBefore LOURIE, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.Ultimax Cement Manufacturing Corporation, Hassan Kunbargi, and KA Group (collectively "Ultimax") appeal from the judgment of the Un

  • Tronzo v. Biomet Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-01-17
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James F. Davis, et al.
    for defendant: Donald R. Dunner, et al.

    Case Number: No. 00-1007

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge.DECISION Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo ("Dr. Tronzo") appeals the judgment of the United S

  • Mentor H/S, Inc. v. Medical Device Alliance, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-04-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-09
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 99-1532, 00

    Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaJudge William D. KellerMentor H/S, Inc. appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Ce

  • Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-02
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-1230

    Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkJudge Alvin K. HellersteinDissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.Enzo Biochem, Inc. appeals from the de

  • Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-06-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-17
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiffs-appellants: Paul Smith, Jenner & Block, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For defendants-appellees: Brian Sieve, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago.

    Case Number: Nos. 2007-1198, -1348

    Before NEWMAN, MAYER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.Ole K. Nilssen ("Nilssen") and Geo Foundatio

  • Carnegie Mellon University v. Hoffmann-LA Roche Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-08
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiffs-appellants: Frederick Colen, Reed Smith, Pittsburgh.
    for defendant: For defendants-appellees: Stephen Rabinowitz, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York.

    Case Number: Nos. 2007-1266 & 2007-1267

    Published opinionBefore LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.Carnegie Mellon University ("CMU") and Three Rivers Biologicals, Inc. (collectively "appellants") appeal from the decision of th

  • Varilease Technology Group, Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2002-05-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-07
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-5114

    Senior Judge Robert J. YockVarilease Technology Group, Inc. appeals from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims granting summary judgment in favor of the United States in Varilea