• AMS, III, Petitioner v. EDG and PS, Respondents, Caseindex_

    Publication Date: 2012-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Family Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Judge Caren Loguercio
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner: Thomas Campagna, Esq.
    for defendant: For Respondent: Nancy Enoksen, Esq. For Co-Respondent: Natasha Meyer. For the Subject Child: Heather Fig, Esq.

    Case Number: Caseindex_

    Cite as: AMS, III v. EDG, Index number, NYLJ 1202556099286, at *1 (Fam., SUF, Decided May 12)Judge Caren LoguercioDecided: May

  • October 9, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Fresh Recruits

    All that talk about law firms shifting their principal recruitment efforts toward lateral hires has apparently been unpersuasive in New Jersey. In this, the Law Journal's seventh annual

    1 minute read

  • October 27, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    July 2010 Bar Exam Results

    The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners on Oct. 8 announced the results of the bar examination given on July 27 and 28, 2010. Of the 2,027 applicants who took the examination, 1,615 passed (the

    1 minute read

  • Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board

    Publication Date: 2010-03-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-30
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiffs and Appellants: Lozeau Drury, Michael R. Lozeau, Richard T. Drury, David A. Zizmor
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents: Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Mary Hackenbracht, Senior Assistant Attorney General, John Davidson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Attorney for Real Party in Interest: Latham & Watkins, Karl S. Lytz, Andrea H. Hogan

    Case Number: No. A124351, A124369, A124370

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4033KARUK TRIBE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.CALIFORNI

  • September 9, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Attorneys Reinstated From Ineligible List

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of R .1:28-2 and R . l:20-1, are eligib

    1 minute read

  • Sandra T.E. v. Grindle

    Publication Date: 2010-03-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-17
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Flaum, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-2920

    ARGUED JANUARY 14, 2010Before FLAUM, ROVNER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.The appellant, Karen Grindle, was principal of Pershing Elementary School at a time when the school district's band teac

  • Matter of Bronson v Bronson

    Publication Date: 2009-06-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 504580

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 4, 2009 504580 In the Matt

  • In Re: Cullar

    Publication Date: 2010-08-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-19
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Justice Lang
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-10-00979-CV

    Petition for Writ of Mandamus DeniedOriginal ProceedingPetition for Writ of MandamusOPINIONBefore Justices Moseley, Lang, and MyersThis original mandamus proceeding arises out of an ele

  • January 4, 2010 | Focus Europe

    Big Deals

    The largest recent transactions, all worth at least €500 million, involving targets or acquirors from each of six European jurisdictions or regions: United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Germany,

    1 minute read

  • Matter of L M Bus Corp. v New York City Dept. of Educ.

    Publication Date: 2009-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1001

    Luis A. Gonzalez, P.J. Peter Tom Richard T. Andrias David B. Saxe, JJ. 1001 Index 104001/08 In re L&M Bus Corp., et al., Petitioners-Respondents-Appellants, v/p