• In Re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92

    Publication Date: 2010-06-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: District Court, New York County
    Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee: Stanley D. Bernstein, Esq., Rebecca M. Katz, Esq., Christian Siebott, Esq., Bernstein Liebhard LLP, New York, New York David Kessler, Esq., Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check LLP, Radnor, Pennsylvania Howard B. Sirota, Esq., Sirota & Sirota LLP, New York, New York Robert A. Wallner, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Safirstein, Esq., Neil Fraser, Esq., Milberg LLP, New York, New York Jules Brody, Esq., Stull, Stull & Brody LLP, New York, New York Fred Taylor Isquith, Esq., Thomas H. Burt, Esq., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, New York
    for defendant: Liaison Counsel for Underwriter Defendants: Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, Esq., Penny Shane, Esq., David M.J. Rein, Esq., Richard J.L. Lamuscio, Esq., Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, New York, New York Liaison Counsel for Issuer Defendants: Jack C. Auspitz, Esq., Joel C. Haims, Esq., Hilary M. Williams, Esq., Angela T. Rella, Esq., Reema S. Abdelhamid, Esq., Morrison and Foerster LLP, New York, New York For the Greene Objectors: Leland L. Greene, Esq., Garden City, New York For the Siegel Objectors: Edward F. Siegel, Esq., Cleveland, Ohio For the Pentz Objectors: John J. Pentz, Esq., Class Action Fairness Group, Maynard, Massachusetts For the Weinstein Objectors: Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Esq., The Weinstein Law Firm, Athens, Texas For the Bechtold Objectors: Theodore A. Bechtold, Esq., Brooklyn, New York James J. Hayes (Pro Se), Annandale, Virgnia

    Case Number: 21 MC 92

    District Judge Shira A. ScheindlinDecided: June 18, 2010For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee:S

  • May 24, 2006 |

    Diversity From the Top Down

    Television and print ads touting United Parcel Service's signature color ask consumers, "What can Brown do for you?" But in the Atlanta-based company's executive suite, a better question might be,

    1 minute read

  • July 7, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    The Layoff List: By the Numbers

    TOTAL LAYOFFS: span class="Appl

    1 minute read

  • Trainer v. Camp Hadar Hatorah

    Publication Date: 2002-09-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2000-11806

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 1111f E/hu AD2d Argued - September 3, 2002 MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P.

  • Skilstaf, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp.

    Publication Date: 2012-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding Before: Betty B. Fletcher and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Bryan McCulley, McCulley McCluer PLLC, Jacksonville, Florida, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Fred A. Kelly, Jr., Sarah E. Andre, Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendants-appellees New Albertson?s. Inc. and Supervalu Inc. Gregory P. Stone, Michael R. Doyes, Carolyn H. Luedtke, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Safeway Inc. Matt Oster, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Walgreen Co. Laurence A. Weiss, Kristi K. Elder, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Palo Alto, California, for defendant-appellee The Kroger Co. Steven H. Frankel, Sandra D. Hauser, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Peter Buscemi, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Rite Aid Corp. Tami S. Smason, Robert H. Griffith, Page R. Barnes, Foley & Lardner LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees CVS Caremark Corp. and Longs Drugs Stores Corp.

    Case Number: No. 10-15338

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 1739 SKILSTAF, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. p cla

  • January 24, 2002 | Law.com

    State Bar to Approve New Slate of Officers

    Long Island attorney A. Thomas Levin is slated for election today as president-elect of the New York State Bar Association, putting him on track to assume the presidency on June 1, 2003.Also

    1 minute read

  • Pfizer Inc. v. Stryker Corp.

    Publication Date: 2004-12-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Kaplan In 1998, Pfizer, Inc. and MTG Divestitures, Inc. (collectively "Pfizer") sold its prosthetic joint and i

  • October 1, 2012 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    AB INBEVMODELOAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV agreed on June 29 to pay $20.1 billion in cash for the 50 percent of Mexican brewer Grupo Modelo S.A.B. de

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Laurienti

    Publication Date: 2010-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-16
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ellen R. Meltzer, Fraud Section, Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff-appellee.
    for defendant: Dennis P. Riordan, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, California; Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Public Defender, Los Angeles, California; Karen L. Landau, Oakland, California; and Irene P. Ayala, Los Angeles, California, for the defendants-appellants.

    Case Number: Nos. 07-50240, 09-50081

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 7514 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRYAN LAURIENTI, a-k-a BRYAN A

  • New York City Employees Retirement System v. Ebbers

    Publication Date: 2003-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Judge Cote NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. EBBERS — On October 29, 2002, New York City Employees’ Retirement System and other New York City pension systems