• In re Polaroid Corporation Securities Litigation, 03 Civ. 6480

    Publication Date: 2006-11-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-11-13
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Sidney Stein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 03 Civ. 6480

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Stein This dispute arises from the demise of the former instant photography giant, Polaroid Corporation, whose

  • Mein v. Carus Corp.

    Publication Date: 2001-02-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-21
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: RIPPLE, ROVNER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. EVANS, Circuit Judge. Common sense takes abeating in this suit, brought under the EmployeeRetirement Income Securi

  • November 17, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Pro Bono Effort Thwarts State Attempt to Decertify Orphanage

    The latest development in a long-running legal battle between a Hudson Valley orphanage and a public school district that has resisted accepting some two dozen orphans into its classrooms invo

    1 minute read

  • Heather Hemmingsen v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A

    Publication Date: 2012-03-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-16
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: Loken, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11-2029

    Submitted: December 15, 2011Before LOKEN, BRIGHT, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.George Hemmingsen opened a Discover Bank credit card account in September 2002 and married Heather Hemmingsen

  • Cathleen Schandelmeier-Bartels v. Chicago Parkdistrict

    Publication Date: 2011-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-08
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Hamilton, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 09-3286, & 09-3468

    ARGUED MAY 28, 2010-DECIDED FEBRUARY8,2011Before MANION, WILLIAMS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.While employed by the Chicago Park District, Cathleen Schandelmeier, a Caucasian, reported to her

  • Skoros v. City of New York

    Publication Date: 2006-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT Before Feinberg, Straub, and Raggi, C.JJ. Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of N

  • Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Corp.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-01-31
    Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California
    Judge: McDONALD, WORK, HUFFMAN
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy D. Cohelan, Isam C. Khoury, Margaret L. Coates, et al.
    for defendant: Ronald C. Redcay, Richard C. Morse, et al.

    Case Number: No. D030628

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.The defendants in this class action lawsuit are companies that refine oil and market gasoline to California

  • May 14, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    RICHARDS v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK

    RICHARDS v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK Judge MukaseyRICHARDS v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK - Samantha Richards ("Richards"), along with Wydeia and Shanealya Richards ("the chi

    1 minute read

  • Bronx County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Justice Sharon A. M. AaronsBoard of Mangagers v. Gould (380405/11)—Motion Granted/extFriedman v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (

  • Bronx County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-05-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Justice John A. BaroneRichter v. Bldg. 16 Youth (350197/11)—Motion GrantedDejesus v. Liberty Lines Transit (303978/11)