Filter This View

  • Ronnie Van Zant Inc. v. Cleopatra Records Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-10-18
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Defendants‐Appellants Cleopatra Records, Inc. and Cleopatra Films: Rishi Bhandari, on the brief, Evan M. Mandel, Mandel Bhandari LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Plaintiffs‐Appellees Ronnie Van Zant, Inc., Gary R. Rossington, Johnny Van Zant, Barbara Houston, Alicia Rapp, and Corinna Gaines Biemiller: Sandor Frankel, Pauline McTernan, on the brief, Richard G. Haddad, Otterbourg P.C., New York, NY For Amici Curiae A&E Television Networks, LLC, Home Box Office, Inc., Metro‐Goldwyn‐Mayer Studios Inc., Nbcuniversal Media, LLC, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Univision Communications Inc., and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., In Support of Defendants‐Appellants: Nathan Siegel, L. Danielle Toaltoan, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY For Amici Curiae The Reporters Committee For Freedom of the Press, American Society of News Editors, the Associated Press Media Editors, Association of Alternative Newsmedia, The Association of American Publishers, Inc., Discovery Communications LLC, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., First Amendment Coalition, First Look Media Works, Inc., The International Documentary Association, The Investigative Reporting Workshop, MPA – The Association of Magazine Media, National Press Photographers Association, and the Tully Center For Free Speech, In Support of Defendants‐Appellants: Bruce D. Brown, Gregg P. Leslie, Caitlin Vogus, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 17-2849

    Consent Decree's Inconsistent Provisions Do Not Support Ban on Movie About Rock Band

  • Brown v. 3M

    Publication Date: 2001-09-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-09-18
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Newman, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-1552

    Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Arizona Judge Paul G. RosenblattOpinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge MAYER.p

  • Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-05-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-05-18
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Rader, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 2007-1400 & 2007-1446

    Published opinionBefore RADER, PLAGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges. MICHEL, Chief Judge, and RADER, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges, have joined Section III.A.2 of the o

  • Johnson & Johnston Associates, Inc. v. R.E. Service Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-03-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-28
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-1076, -1179,

    Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaJudge Charles R. BreyerOpinion of the court filed PER CURIAM, in which Chief Judge MAYER, Senior Circuit Judge