Filter This View

  • Mattox v. County Commissioners' Court

    Publication Date: 2012-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-25
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Kem Thompson Frost Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-11-00383-CV

    Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed September 25, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals OPINION After a county commissioners court denied an application filed by t

  • Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

    Publication Date: 2013-06-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-24
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 11-345

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6442 ABIGAIL NOEL FISHER, PETITIONER v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTI

  • Laurino v. Syringa General Hospital

    Publication Date: 2002-02-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-02
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: KOZINSKI and GOULD, Circuit Judges, SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge: James Laurino appeals the district court' s order denying his Rule 60(b) motion

  • In the Matter of KRAHAM v. RABBITT

    Publication Date: 2004-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 96785

    Decided and Entered: October 22, 2004 96785 ________________________________ In the Matter of BONNIE H. KRAHAM et al., Appellants, v ANN G. RABBITT et al., br/

  • Vonlee Nicole Titlow v. Sherry L. Burt, Warden

    Publication Date: 2012-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-22
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-2488

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONPursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206File Name: 12a0147p.06Argued: January 17, 2012Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judg

  • Trudy's Texas Star, Inc. v. City of Austin

    Publication Date: 2010-03-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-12
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Bob Pemberton, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-07-00373-CV

    OPINIONThis case requires us to consider circumstances in which a municipality's regulatory discretion can be limited by estoppel or contract. Trudy's Texas Star, Inc. d/b/a South Congress Caf&

  • People v Hernandez (Steven)

    Publication Date: 2009-08-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Term, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    SUPREME COURT APPELLATE TERM: FIRST DEPARTMENT PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ. The People of the State of New York, Respondent,/

  • Matter of Williams v McDonough

    Publication Date: 2007-10-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 503390

    Decided and Entered: October 17, 2007 503390 ________________________________ In the Matter of JENNIE M. WILLIAMS et al., Respondents, v EDWARD

  • McNeil v. United States Postal Service

    Publication Date: 2001-02-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-08
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Per Curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-3428

    DECISIONSamuel McNeil appeals from the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board denying for lack of jurisdiction his claim that the United States Postal Service ("the agency") failed to

  • In the Interest of C.H.C., A Child;

    Publication Date: 2011-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-28
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-0480

    Orders PronouncedORDERS ON CAUSESPursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of app