• Microsoft Corporation. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2016-07-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Lynch and Carney, C.JJ., and Bolden, D.J.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Microsoft Corporation: Robert M. Loeb and Brian P. Goldman, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY; Guy Petrillo, Petrillo Klein & Boxer LLP, New York, NY; James M. Garland and Alexander A. Berengaut, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC; Bradford L. Smith, David M. Howard, John Frank, Jonathan Palmer, and Nathaniel Jones, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA; on the brief, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. For Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York: Serrin Turner, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief, Justin Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Amici Curiae Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, American Civil Liberties Union, The Constitution Project, and Electronic Frontier Foundation, in support of Appellant: Brett J. Williamson, David K. Lukmire, Nate Asher, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY; Faiza Patel, Michael Price, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY; Hanni Fakhoury, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA; Alex Abdo, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Apple, Inc., in support of Appellant: Kenneth M. Dreifach, Marc J. Zwillinger, Zwillgen PLLC, New York, NY and Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae BSA; The Software Alliance, Center for Democracy and Technology, Chamber of Commerce of the United States, The National Association of Manufacturers, and ACT | The App Association, in support of Appellant: Andrew J. Pincus, Paul W. Hughes, James F. Tierney, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Anthony J. Colangelo, in support of Appellant: Steven A. Engel, Dechert LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae AT&T Corp., Rackspace US, Inc., Computer & Communications Industry Association, i2 Coalition, and Application Developers Alliance, in support of Appellant: Alan C. Raul, Kwaku A. Akowuah, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Ireland: Peter D. Stergios, Charles D. Ray, McCarter & English, LLP, New York, NY and Hartford, CT. For Amici Curiae Amazon.com, Inc., and Accenture PLC, in support of Appellant: Peter Karanjia, Eric J. Feder, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Verizon Communications, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett‐Packard Co., eBay Inc., Salesforce.com, Inc., and Infor, in support of Appellant: Michael Vatis, Jeffrey A. Novack, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York, NY; Randal S. Milch, Verizon Communications Inc., New York, NY; Kristofor T. Henning, Hewlett‐Packard Co., Wayne, PA; Amy Weaver, Daniel Reed, Salesforce.com, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Orin Snyder, Thomas G. Hungar, Alexander H. Southwell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Mark Chandler, Cisco Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA; Aaron Johnson, eBay Inc., San Jose, CA. For Amici Curiae Media Organizations, in support of Appellant: Laura R. Handman, Alison Schary, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae Computer and Data Science Experts, in support of Appellant: Philip Warrick, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR. For Amicus Curiae Jan Philipp Albrecht, Member of the European Parliament, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Jan Philipp Albrecht, Member of the European Parliament, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY; Edward McGarr, Simon McGarr, Dervila McGarr, McGarr Solicitors, Dublin, Ireland.

    Case Number: 14-2985

    Cite as: Microsoft v. US, 14-2985, NYLJ 1202762745398, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided July 14, 2016)CASE NAMEMicrosoft Corporation, Appellant v. United States of Amer

  • City of Dallas v. Diane Sanchez, 15-0094 (TexApp Dist 07/01/2016)

    Publication Date: 2016-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2016-07-01
    Court: Supreme Court of Texas
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 15-0094

    ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXASPER CURIAMHours before Matthew Sanchez died from a drug overdose, a 9-1-1 operator dispatc

  • June 30, 2016 | New York Law Journal

    Trends in Patents and Trade Secrets Change Landscape of Innovation

    "It is said that the whole category of diagnostic claims is at risk. It is also said that a crisis of patent law and medical innovation may be upon us, and there seems to be some tr

    1 minute read

  • Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

    Publication Date: 2016-06-27
    Practice Area: Health Care Law | Constitutional Law
    Industry: Health Care
    Date Filed: 2016-06-27
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 15–274

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 6679 WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. JOHN HELLERSTE

  • June 23, 2016 |

    Graber v. Lintz

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis.Graber v. Lintz 2016 WL 3365314Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.UNPUBLISHED OPINION.…

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Nathan Brown, 13-1706

    Publication Date: 2016-06-21
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Pooler, Sack, and Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee: Brenda K. Sannes and Richard D. Belliss, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Richard S. Hartunian, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, Syracuse, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: S. Michael Musa-Obregon, Maspeth, NY.

    Case Number: 13-1706

    Cite as: US v. Brown, 13-1706, NYLJ 1202760415134, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided June 14, 2016) CASE NAMEUnited States of America, Appellee v. Nathan Brown, Defendan

  • Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee

    Publication Date: 2016-06-20
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation | Civil Appeals
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2016-06-20
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 15–446

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 6354 CUOZZO SPEED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, PETITIONER v. MICHELLE K. LEE,

  • USA v. Derry, 15-1829

    Publication Date: 2016-06-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Pooler, Parker, and Livingston, C.J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee: Michael E. Runowicz & Marc H. Silverman, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief, Avi Perry, Assistant United States Attorney, for Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: David S. Keenan, Assistant Federal Defender, for Terence S. Ward, Federal Public Defender for the District of Connecticut, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Case Number: 15-1829

    Cite as: USA v. Derry, 15-1829, NYLJ 1202759441942, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided June 2, 2016) CASENAME United States of America, Appellee v. Leroy Derry, Defendant

  • United States v. Stavros Ganias, 12-240-cr

    Publication Date: 2016-05-31
    Practice Area: Tax | Constitutional Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Katzmann, Ch. C.J, Jacobs, Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi, Wesley, Hall, Livingston, Lynch, Chin, Lohier, Carney, and Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee United States of America: Sarala V. Nagala, Anastasia Enos King, Jonathan N. Francis, Assistant United States Attorneys; Wendy R. Waldron, Senior Counsel, U.S. Dep't of Justice, on the brief, Sandra S. Glover, for Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Stavros Ganias: Daniel E. Wenner, John W. Cerreta, Day Pitney LLP, Hartford, CT, on the brief, Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., Day Pitney LLP, Stamford, CT. (Counsel for amici curiae are listed in Appendix A.)

    Case Number: 12-240-cr

    Cite as: US v. Ganias, 12-240-cr, NYLJ 1202758892542, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 27, 2016) CASE NAME United States of America, Appellee v. Stavros M. Ganias,

  • US v. Stavros Ganias, 12-240-cr

    Publication Date: 2016-05-31
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Constitutional Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Katzmann, Ch. C.J, Jacobs, Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi, Wesley, Hall, Livingston, Lynch, Chin, Lohier, Carney, and Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee United States of America: Sarala V. Nagala, Anastasia Enos King, Jonathan N. Francis, Assistant United States Attorneys; Wendy R. Waldron, Senior Counsel, U.S. Dep't of Justice, on the brief, Sandra S. Glover, for Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Stavros Ganias: Daniel E. Wenner, John W. Cerreta, Day Pitney LLP, Hartford, CT, on the brief, Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., Day Pitney LLP, Stamford, CT. (Counsel for amici curiae are listed in Appendix A.)

    Case Number: 12-240-cr

    Cite as: US v. Ganias, 12-240-cr, NYLJ 1202758892485, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 27, 2016)CASE NAMEUnited States of America, Appellee v. Stavros M. Ganias, De