Filter This View

  • RSR Corp. v. Siegmund

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-26
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Mary Murphy Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-09-00571-CV

    REVERSE and REMANDOPINIONBefore Justices FitzGerald, Murphy, and Thomas*fn1In this suit involving allegations of misuse of confidential information, appellan

  • East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co., Inc. v. Werline

    Publication Date: 2010-03-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-12
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Nathan L. Hecht Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-0135

    Argued January 16, 2008JUSTICE HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which J USTICE O'N EILL, JUSTICEWAINWRIGHT, JUSTICE JOHNSON, J USTICE WILLETT, and J USTICE GUZMAN joined.JUSTICE W

  • July 13, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Approved Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES CONSUMER PROTECTION 09-2-0569 Belmont Condominium Association Inc. v. Geibel, App. Div. (Parrillo, P.J.A.D.)

    1 minute read

  • Welzel v. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC

    Publication Date: 2002-01-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-12-17
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Circuit Judge BIRCH
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-14875

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. (December 17, 2001)Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Ju

  • Watson v. United States

    Publication Date: 2009-09-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-09-10
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Kramer, Associate Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-CM-1357

    Argued May 18, 2007Before REID and KRAMER, Associate Judges, and SCHWELB, Senior Judge.Opinion concurring in the judgment but dissenting in part by Senior Judge SCHWELB at page 8.Following a

  • Fenstermaker v. Bush, 05 Civ. 7468

    Publication Date: 2007-06-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-06-12
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Richard Berman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05 Civ. 7468

    District Judge Richard M. Berman U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Berman I. Background On or about September 26, 2006, Sc

  • United States of America v. Charles Landwer, Jr

    Publication Date: 2011-05-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-28
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-2797

    ARGUED MARCH 1, 2011Before KANNE, ROVNER, and WOOD,Circuit Judges.Charles Landwer, Jr. pleaded guilty to mail fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and at sentencing received a two-level i

  • March 6, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Consider the implications of mandatory advancement of legal fees

    Corporate indemnification and advancement of legal expenses are distinct rights, with advancement being a narrower and more provisional contractual benefit. By relieving corporate officia

    1 minute read

  • Webster v. Public School Employees of Washington, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-04-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-18
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Harry Pregerson, Sidney R. Thomas, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-35085

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. GOULD, Circuit Judge: This case involves exemptions from state and federal overtime requirements for bona fide ad

  • In the Interest of C.J.S.

    Publication Date: 2012-09-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-20
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Martha Hill Jamison Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-12-00330-CV

    Affirmed and Opinion filed September 20, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals OPINION This case presents the difficult question that Departmenta href="#D* name="S*