• Piedmont Environmental Council v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    Publication Date: 2009-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-18
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Michael, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for petitioners: Jonathan Feinberg, NYS Public Service Commission, Albany, N.Y.; Belina Anderson, Gilberti, Stinziano, Heintz & Smith, New York.
    for defendant: Attorney for respondent: Robert Solomon, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. Attorney for intervenors: Brian Gish, Davis, Wright & Tremaine, Washington, D.C.

    Case Number: Nos. 07-1651, 07-1864, 07-1865 & 07-1866

    PUBLISHEDArgued: September 24, 2008Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and Richard L. VOORHEES, United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sitting by design

  • Caudle v. Bristow Optical Company, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-09-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-09-14
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Diarmuid F. O' Scannlain, Susan P. Graber, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John Gabroy
    for defendant: David A. Selden

    Case Number: No. 98-15537, 98

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. O' SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: In this pregnancy discrimination case, we must consider various issues raised under

  • Allgood Entertainment, Inc. v. Dileo Entertainment and Touring, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-07-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Judge Harold Baer Jr.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09 Civ. 5377

    Judge Harold Baer Jr.Decided: June 29OPINION AND ORDERThis case is about whether or not Michael Jackson, through his alleged

  • Burck v. Mars, Inc., 08 Civ. 1330 (DC)

    Publication Date: 2008-06-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-23
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Denny Chin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08 Civ. 1330 (DC)

    District Judge Denny Chin U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiff: By: Scott M. Rothman, Esq. Halberstadt Cu

  • January 10, 2011 | Texas Lawyer

    Here Come the Judges: Go Behind the Blackboard at the College for New Judges

    The yard signs have been picked up, and the campaign donors have been thanked. Now, all that's left to do for the more than 100 incoming jurists who gathered in Austin last month is to start

    1 minute read

  • Cohen v. Viray, 08-3860-cv

    Publication Date: 2010-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Before: Hall, Livingston, and Chin,* C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: GARY D. SESSER (William F. Sondericker, Laura Anne Reeds, and Christopher J. Young, on the brief), Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, New York, New York, for Intervenor-Appellant D. David Cohen. THOMAS G. AMON, Law Offices of Thomas G. Amon, New York, New York, and Brian J. Robbins, and Gregory E. Del Gaizo, on the brief, Robbins Umeda LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee Alvin Viray, Derivatively on Behalf of DHB Industries, Inc.
    for defendant: ERIC RIEDER (David P. Kasakove and Chris M. LaRocco, of counsel, on the brief), Bryan Cave LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee DHB Industries, Inc., now known as Point Blank Solutions, Inc.. MARK HOLLAND (Mary K. Dulka, on the brief), Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees Barry Berkman, Cary Chasin, Gary Nadelman, and Jerome Krantz. JEROME GOTKIN, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee David H. Brooks. STEVEN G. KOBRE (Francisco J. Navarro, on the brief), Kobre & Kim LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee Dawn M. Schlegel. RACHEL PENSKI, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees David Brooks International, Inc., Elizabeth Brooks International, Inc., and Andrew Brooks International, Inc.

    Case Number: 08-3860-cv

    Cite as: Cohen v. Viray, 08-3860-cv, NYLJ 1202472745889, at *1 (2d Cir, Decided September 30, 2010)Before: Hall, Livingston, and Chin,* C.JJ.p class="decid

  • July 1, 2013 | International

    Korea's Foreign Legion

    Last fall international law firms responded to the long-awaited opening of the Korean legal market by stampeding through the door. At this writing, some 20 U.S. or U.K. firms have opened or

    1 minute read

  • KGK Jewelry LLC, Plaintiff v. ESDNetwork and Steve Yeko, Defendants, 11 Civ. 9236

    Publication Date: 2013-01-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Laura Taylor Swain
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11 Civ. 9236

    Cite as: KGK Jewelry LLC v. ESDNetwork, 11 Civ. 9236, NYLJ 1202584643347, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 8, 2013)District Judge Laura Taylor Swainp cla

  • Barnes v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company

    Publication Date: 2000-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-05-30
    Court: Tenn. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: HOLDER, J., ANDERSON, C.J., DROWOTA, BIRCH, and BARKER, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dan M. Norwood
    for defendant: Larry W. Barnes, Tim K. Garrett, Michael S. Moschel, and James M. Glascow, Jr.

    Case Number: No. W1997-00247-

    The plaintiff, Larry W. Barnes, was employed by the defendant, Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany ("Goodyear"). Barnes began working for the defendant in 1970. He had worked inseveral different

  • Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express Corp.

    Publication Date: 2001-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-20
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Spatt, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-7343

    Argued: November 8, 2000Appeal from a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Alvin K. Hellerstein, Judge), in favor of the Plaintiff, Fujitsu Limited, i