Filter This View

  • People v. Sokolsky

    Publication Date: 2010-09-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-21
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth C. Byrne and Eric J. Kohm, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Richard E. Holly, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. B212437

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 12349THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARK SOKOLSKY, Defendant and Appellant.

  • August 22, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    Forecast: Law Firms to Continue Bumpy Ride Through 2008

    Since 2001, the legal industry has been characterized by double-digit profit growth, strong demand, solid productivity and controlled expense growth. That all started to change in the se

    1 minute read

  • July 3, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    Realty Law Digest

    Adverse Possession& No Authority for the Proposition That Equitable Defense May Defeat Claim of Adverse Possession& Six Foot Fence Predated 2008 Amendments to RPAPL&

    1 minute read

  • August 21, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    Forecast: Law Firms to Continue Bumpy Ride Through 2008

    Since 2001, the legal industry has been characterized by double-digit profit growth, strong demand, solid productivity and controlled expense growth. That all started to change in the second half o

    1 minute read

  • Mary Litchhult, Plaintiff v. USTRIVE2, Inc., Defendant, 10-CV-3311 (JFB) (ARL)

    Publication Date: 2011-09-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph F. Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff: Mary Litchhult is proceeding pro se.
    for defendant: Attorneys for defendant: Robert J. Anderson and James M. Woolsey, III, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 10-CV-3311 (JFB) (ARL)

    Cite as: Litchhult v. USTRIVE2, INC., 10-CV-3311 (JFB) (ARL), NYLJ 1202513775889, at *1 (EDNY, Decided September 1, 2011)District Judge Joseph F. Bia

  • Cite as: Torchlight Loan Services, LLC v. Column Financial, Inc., 11 Civ. 7426

    Publication Date: 2012-08-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Robert W. Sweet
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: By: Christopher R. Belmonte, Esq.; Pamela A. Bosswick, Esq.; Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP; New York, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: By: Allan N. Taffet, Esq.; Timothy J. Pastore, Esq.; Joshua Klein, Esq.; Duval & Stachenfeld LLP; New York, NY.
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 7426

    Cite as: Torchlight Loan Services, LLC v. Column Financial, Inc., 11 Civ. 7426, NYLJ 1202567710917, at *1 (SDNY, Decided July 22, 2012)District Judge Robe

  • October 29, 2010 | Corporate Counsel

    Five Ways Companies Can Prevent Their California Employees From Handing Their Secrets Over to Competitors

    Introduction It's been a tough two months for the Hewlett-Packard Company. First, HP's boar

    1 minute read

  • April 21, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    ENEMIES OF the plaintiffs' firm Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach may do well to heed the words of Friedrich Nietzsche: What does not kill me makes me stronger.Take, for instanc

    1 minute read

  • Filar v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

    Publication Date: 2008-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-22
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Flaum, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-1275

    ARGUED JANUARY 25, 2008Before FLAUM, ROVNER, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.Valerie T. Filar formerly taught as an untenured, full-time teacher in the Polish bilingual education department at the Edw

  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-06-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-03-22
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-150

    Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, we decide under what circumstances a product's design is distinctive, and therefore protectible, in an action for infringement of