• The City Of New York v. The Permanent Mission Of India To The United Nations, 08-1805-cv, 08-1806-cv

    Publication Date: 2010-08-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Calabresi, Hall, C.JJ., Sessions,1 D.J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York (John Low-Beer, Scott Shorr, Sarah Stewart, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Aaron Stiefel, Robert A. Kandel, Marisa Pizzolato, Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, N.Y., David O. Bickart, Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellants. H. Thomas Byron III, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington D.C. (Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, James H. Thessin, Deputy Legal Adviser, United States Department of State, Susan Benda, Attorney Adviser, United States Department of State, Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Lev. L. Dassin, Acting United States Attorney, David S. Jones, Assistant United States Attorney, Douglas Letter, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, on the briefs), for Amicus Curiae United States of America.

    Case Number: 08-1805-cv 08-1806-cv

    Cite as: The City Of New York v. The Permanent Mission Of India To The United Nations, 08-1805-cv, 08-1806-cv, NYLJ 1202470191621, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 17, 2010)p clas

  • Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress International Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-02-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-02
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-40632

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. WIENER, Circuit Judge:Plaintiff-Appellant Peter Veeck ("Veeck") appeals from a summary judgment of the district co

  • Creditriskmonitor.com, Inc. v. Feinsterstock

    Publication Date: 2004-08-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Nassau County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Warshawsky In April 2001, plaintiff initiated this action by show cause order contending, generally, that the defendant Samuel Fens

  • February 24, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    2002-04 Supreme Court Committees Membership

    Attached are the rosters of the Supreme Court's 2002-04 Rules Committees and Program and Jury Charge Committees appointed by the Court pursuant to the Operational Guidelines for Supreme Court

    1 minute read

  • Amendola v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 07 Civ. 6088

    Publication Date: 2008-06-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-04
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07 Civ. 6088

    District Judge Denise Cote U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiff: Ilann M. Maazel Elizabeth S. Sayl

  • United States,v.,Whitten,07-1320-crDecided: June 30, 2010

    Publication Date: 2010-07-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-1320-cr

    United States v. Whitten Before: Jacobs, Ch.J., Miner, and Livingston, C.JJ. Decided: June 30, 2010 Beverly Van Ness, New York, New York; Barry J. Fisher, Sa

  • Lane v. Facebook, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-09-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-20
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael H. Page, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, D.C.; Steven F. Helfand, Helfand Law Offices, San Francisco, California, for the objectors-appellants. Scott A. Kamber, Kamber Law, LLC, New York, New York, for the plaintiffs-appellees.
    for defendant: Michael G. Rhodes, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees.

    Case Number: No. 10-16380 No. 10-16398

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 10846SEAN LANE; MOHANNAED SHEIKHA; SEAN MARTIN; ALI SAMMOUR; MOHAMMAED ZIDAN; SARA KARROW; COLBY HENSON; DENTON HUNKER; FIRAS SHEIKHA;

  • January 18, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Albany, appellants v. Serio, respondent

    Decided Jan. 12, 2006Before Cardona, P.J.; Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered December 2, 2003 in Albany Cou

    1 minute read

  • Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, 11-0316-cv

    Publication Date: 2013-05-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Kearse, Lohier, and Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Steven J. Phillips, Stanley J. Levy, Jerome H. Block, Amber R. Long, Lisa W. Davis, Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, New York, New York, on the Brief, Victoria E. Phillips, New York, N.Y.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: John H. Beisner, Jessica D. Miller, Geoffrey M. Wyatt, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Washington, D.C.; Gary R. Long, John K. Sherk, III, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Kansas City, Missouri; Tammy B. Webb, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, San Francisco, California, on the Brief, Sheila Birnbaum, New York, N.Y.

    Case Number: 11-0316-cv

    Cite as: Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, 11-0316-cv, NYLJ 1202598460698, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 1, 2013)Before: Kearse, Lohier, and Droney, C.JJ.p

  • Alexander v. Cahill

    Publication Date: 2010-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-12
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Calabresi, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Docket Nos. 07-3677-cv (L), 07-3900-cv (XAP)

    Argued: January 22, 2009Before: WALKER and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.*fn1New York's Appellate Division adopted new rules prohibiting certain types of attorney a