Filter This View

  • Jackson v. Dist. of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics

    Publication Date: 2001-04-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-12
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-AA-1500

    On Respondent's Motion to Dismiss.On November 20, 2000, respondent, the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics ("the Board"), certified the results of the November 7th general election,

  • M7 Capital LLC v. Miller

    Publication Date: 2010-05-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Tracy Christopher Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-08-00951-CV

    Motion for Rehearing Overruled; Reversed and Remanded; Opinion of March 25, 2010 Withdrawn; and Substitute Opinion filed April 29, 2010.SUBSTITUTE OPINIONWe overrule appellee's motion for rehear

  • In re Estate of Vrana

    Publication Date: 2010-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-17
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-09-00377-CV

    OPINIONSitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice, Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice, Steven C. Hilbig, Justice.AFFIRMEDThis is an appeal from a judgment in a probate case awarding attorneys' fees

  • July 9, 2007 | Legal Times

    Politics As Usual

    How significant is the Supreme Court's June 25 decision in Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life

    1 minute read

  • Martinez v. Ryan

    Publication Date: 2012-03-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-03-20
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10-1001

      LUIS MARIANO MARTINEZ, Petitioner v. CHARLES L. RYAN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTI

  • December 28, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Second Circuit Review

    In this month's column, we report on a noteworthy decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, holding that a district court does not have jurisdiction to certify a class acti

    1 minute read

  • Kingwood Pines Hospital LLC v. Gomez

    Publication Date: 2011-11-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-11-22
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Martha Hill Jamison Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-11-00050-CV

    In The Fourteenth Court of AppealsOPINIONThis is a health care liability case governed by the Medical Liability Act.*fn1Appellants bring an interloc

  • Grotjohn Precise Connexiones Int'l v. Jem Financial Inc.

    Publication Date: 1999-11-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-11-10
    Court: The Court Of Appeals Sixth Appellate District Of Texas At Texark
    Judge: CORNELIUS, C.J., GRANT and ROSS, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 06-98-00161

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.OPINION This is an appeal of a summary judgment granted in favor of JEM Financial, Inc., J. W. Taylo

  • Meekins v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-12-17
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Brian Quinn Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-09-0144-CR

    OpinionBefore QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.David O. Meekins pled guilty to and was convicted of possessing two or less ounces of marijuana after the trial court denied his motion to

  • Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents

    Publication Date: 2000-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-01-11
    Court: Supreme Court Of The United States
    Judge: O'CONNOR
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 98791

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA or Act), 81 Stat. 602, as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 62