Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
44 results for 'Cravath/////// judge:"Per Curiam"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-12-30
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee United States of America: Samson A. Enzer, Andrew C. Adams, Karl Metzner, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief, Gina M. Castellano, Assistant United States Attorney, for Geoffrey S. Berman, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Corey Canteen: Benjamin Gruenstein, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY.
Case Number: 17-1525-cr
Career Enhancement Properly Applied Where Prior State Robberies Were Crimes of Violence
Publication Date: 2019-11-01
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Kenneth I. Schacter, on the brief, Peter Sabin Willet, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Boston, MA and New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Michael A. Paskin, Daniel Slifkin, and Damaris Hernandez, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr., Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, NY.
Case Number: 16-1124
To Be Binding, Purported Contracts Expressly Required Defendant's Countersignature
Publication Date: 2019-10-02
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Jesse Furman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-CV-3735
Firm's Claim South Korean Bank Stole 8 Billion Euros Dismissed as Facially Implausible
August 23, 2019 | Litigation Daily
"We are satisfied that Qualcomm has shown, at minimum, the presence of serious questions on the merits of the district court's determination that Qualcomm has an antitrust duty to license its [standard essential patents] to rival chip suppliers," wrote the court.
1 minute read
August 23, 2019 | Legaltech News
"We are satisfied that Qualcomm has shown, at minimum, the presence of serious questions on the merits of the district court's determination that Qualcomm has an antitrust duty to license its [standard essential patents] to rival chip suppliers," wrote the court.
1 minute read
August 23, 2019 | The Recorder
"We are satisfied that Qualcomm has shown, at minimum, the presence of serious questions on the merits of the district court's determination that Qualcomm has an antitrust duty to license its [standard essential patents] to rival chip suppliers," wrote the court.
1 minute read
March 15, 2019 | Law.com
Apple notched a pretrial victory worth billions of dollars while setting evidentiary rules for a looming trial with Qualcomm.
1 minute read
December 22, 2017 | New York Law Journal
A look back at some of the major events and rulings from New York's top court, the Court of Appeals, in 2017.
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2017-03-29
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Robert A. Katzmann, Ch.J., Debra Ann Livingston, C.J., and Margo K. Brodie, D.J.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant Matthew Christiansen: Susan Chana Lask, Law Offices of Susan Chana Lask, New York, NY.
for defendant: For Defendants-Appellees Omnicom Group Incorporated, DDB Worldwide Communications Group Incorporated, Peter Hempel, and Chris Brown: Shira Franco and Judith Kong, on the brief, Howard J. Rubin, Davis & Gilbert LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Joe Cianciotto: Rick Ostrove, Leeds Brown Law, P.C., Carle Place, NY. For Amicus Curiae Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in support of Plaintiff-Appellant: P. David Lopez, General Counsel; Jennifer S. Goldstein, Associate General Counsel; and Margo Pave, Assistant General Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of General Counsel, Washington, D.C., on the brief, Barbara L. Sloan, Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of General Counsel, Washington, D.C. For Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union; New York Civil Liberties Union; 9to5, National Association of Working Women; A Better Balance; American Association of University Women; California Women's Law Center; Coalition of Labor Union Women; Equal Rights Advocates; Gender Justice; Legal Momentum; Legal Voice; National Association of Women Lawyers; National Partnership for Women and Families; National Women's Law Center; Southwest Women's Law Center; Women Employed; Women's Law Center of Maryland; Women's Law Project, in support of Plaintiff-Appellant: Lenora M. Lapidus, Gillian L. Thomas, Ria Tabacco Mar, and Leslie Cooper, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY; Erin Beth Harrist, Robert Hodgson and Christopher Dunn, New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae 128 Members of Congress, in support of Plaintiff-Appellant: Peter T. Barbur, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae National Center for Lesbian Rights, in support of Plaintiff-Appellant: Shannon P. Minter and Christopher F. Stoll, National Center for Lesbian Rights, San Francisco, CA. For Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., in support of Plaintiff-Appellant: Michael D.B. Kavey, Brooklyn, NY; Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., New York, NY; Gregory R. Nevins, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
Case Number: 16-748
Discrimination Claim Based on Gender Stereotypes Is R
February 24, 2014 | New York Law Journal
In United States v. Vilar
1 minute read
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
