• March 19, 2019 | Litigation Daily

    2nd Circuit Upholds Judge's Decision to Bar Reed Smith's Pursuit of $6.75M in Attorney Fees

    District Judge Naomi Buchwald rightfully exercised her jurisdiction to block Reed Smith's state court pursuit of attorney fees through an "impermissible end run around" the district court, the panel found.

    1 minute read

  • March 19, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Reed Smith Thwarted Again in Bid for $6.75M in Attorney Fees

    District Judge Naomi Buchwald rightfully exercised her jurisdiction to block Reed Smith's state court pursuit of attorney fees through an "impermissible end run around" the district court, the panel found.

    1 minute read

  • Levy v. BASF Metals Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2019-03-06
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff‐Appellant: Susan Levy, pro se, New York, N.Y.
    for defendant: For Defendants‐Appellees BASF Metals Limited and BASF Corporation: Peter A. Farrell, on the brief, Michael F. Williams, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, D.C.; For Defendant‐Appellee HSBC Bank USA, N.A.: Leigh M. Nathanson, Laura C. Harris, on the brief, Damien J. Marshall, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, N.Y. For Defendants‐Appellees Goldman Sachs International, the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC f/k/a Goldman, Sachs & Co.: Stephen Ehrenberg, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, N.Y. For Defendant‐Appellee ICBC Standard Bank PLC.: Robert G. Houck, Clifford Chance US LLP, New York, N.Y. For Defendants‐Appellees UBS AG and UBS Securities LLC: Mark A. Kirsch, D. Jarrett Arp, Melanie L. Katsur, Indraneel Sur, on the brief, Eric J. Stock, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, N.Y. For Defendant‐Appellee The London Platinum and Palladium Fixing Company Ltd: Morgan J. Feder, on the brief, Ethan E. Litwin, Dechert LLP, New York, N.Y.

    Case Number: 17-3823

    Limitation Period on Commodity Exchange Act Claims Accruing in 2008 Expired in 2010

  • June 1, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Appeals Court to Reconsider $21M Bad-Faith Award It Had Previously Thrown Out

    The Superior Court issued a per curiam order agreeing to have the three-judge panel reconsider its decision in Berg v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance. The order further withdrew the panel's previous decision, and said the parties did not need to file any additional briefs regarding the case.

    1 minute read

  • Rana v. Islam

    Publication Date: 2018-04-12
    Practice Area: Damages | Employment Litigation
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee Mashud Parves Rana: Matthew Larrabee, on the brief, D. Brett Kohlhofer, Dechert, LLP, New York, N.Y. and Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: Monirul Islam, pro se.

    Case Number: 16-3966-cv

    FLSA, TVPRA Suit Remanded; Cumulative Liquidated Damages Wrongly Awarded Under FLSA, NYLL

  • Appellate Division First Department Cases decided on: February 22, 2018 By Friedman, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Gesmer, JJ.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-26
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Unsigned
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Multiple

    Appellate DivisionFirst Department

  • THE COURT ANNOUNCES THE FOLLOWING MOTION ORDERS:

    Publication Date: 2017-06-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: First Judicial Department, Appellate Division
    Judge: Acosta, P.J., Tom, Friedman, Sweeny, Jr., Renwick, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    M-1908 Joel Roth and Mary Roth, Plaintiffs-Appellants, -against- Lenox Terrace Associates Defendants-Respondents. An appeal having been taken from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, en

  • November 10, 2016 | New Jersey Law Journal

    In The Matter of the Petition of S. Jersey Gas Co.

    NO. A-0151-15T1 NOV. 7, 2016 (DATE DECIDED) PER CURIAM PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: Mariel R. Bronen (Dechert LLP, attorneys; Ms. Bronen, George G. Gordon and Roxanne R. Wr

    1 minute read

  • Microsoft Corporation. v. United States

    Publication Date: 2016-07-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Lynch and Carney, C.JJ., and Bolden, D.J.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Microsoft Corporation: Robert M. Loeb and Brian P. Goldman, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY; Guy Petrillo, Petrillo Klein & Boxer LLP, New York, NY; James M. Garland and Alexander A. Berengaut, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC; Bradford L. Smith, David M. Howard, John Frank, Jonathan Palmer, and Nathaniel Jones, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA; on the brief, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. For Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York: Serrin Turner, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief, Justin Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Amici Curiae Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, American Civil Liberties Union, The Constitution Project, and Electronic Frontier Foundation, in support of Appellant: Brett J. Williamson, David K. Lukmire, Nate Asher, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY; Faiza Patel, Michael Price, Brennan Center for Justice, New York, NY; Hanni Fakhoury, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA; Alex Abdo, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Apple, Inc., in support of Appellant: Kenneth M. Dreifach, Marc J. Zwillinger, Zwillgen PLLC, New York, NY and Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae BSA; The Software Alliance, Center for Democracy and Technology, Chamber of Commerce of the United States, The National Association of Manufacturers, and ACT | The App Association, in support of Appellant: Andrew J. Pincus, Paul W. Hughes, James F. Tierney, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Anthony J. Colangelo, in support of Appellant: Steven A. Engel, Dechert LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae AT&T Corp., Rackspace US, Inc., Computer & Communications Industry Association, i2 Coalition, and Application Developers Alliance, in support of Appellant: Alan C. Raul, Kwaku A. Akowuah, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. For Amicus Curiae Ireland: Peter D. Stergios, Charles D. Ray, McCarter & English, LLP, New York, NY and Hartford, CT. For Amici Curiae Amazon.com, Inc., and Accenture PLC, in support of Appellant: Peter Karanjia, Eric J. Feder, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae Verizon Communications, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett‐Packard Co., eBay Inc., Salesforce.com, Inc., and Infor, in support of Appellant: Michael Vatis, Jeffrey A. Novack, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York, NY; Randal S. Milch, Verizon Communications Inc., New York, NY; Kristofor T. Henning, Hewlett‐Packard Co., Wayne, PA; Amy Weaver, Daniel Reed, Salesforce.com, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Orin Snyder, Thomas G. Hungar, Alexander H. Southwell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Mark Chandler, Cisco Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA; Aaron Johnson, eBay Inc., San Jose, CA. For Amici Curiae Media Organizations, in support of Appellant: Laura R. Handman, Alison Schary, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae Computer and Data Science Experts, in support of Appellant: Philip Warrick, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR. For Amicus Curiae Jan Philipp Albrecht, Member of the European Parliament, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae Jan Philipp Albrecht, Member of the European Parliament, in support of Appellant: Owen C. Pell, Ian S. Forrester, Q.C., Paige C. Spencer, White & Case, New York, NY; Edward McGarr, Simon McGarr, Dervila McGarr, McGarr Solicitors, Dublin, Ireland.

    Case Number: 14-2985

    Cite as: Microsoft v. US, 14-2985, NYLJ 1202762745398, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided July 14, 2016)CASE NAMEMicrosoft Corporation, Appellant v. United States of Amer

  • December 24, 2015 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Justices End Pa. Bid to Reinstate $80M Drug Case

    Likely ending the Pennsylvania state government's bid to reinstate nearly $80 million in damages against two pharmaceutical giants, the state Supreme Court has affirmed a lower court's holdin

    1 minute read