Filter This View

  • E.K.M. v. T.G.

    Publication Date: 2021-06-03
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1397-19

    Defendant appealed from the FRO entered against him, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to find that he committed the predicate acts of harassment or assault against plaintiff, or that a FRO was necessary for plaintiff's future protection.

  • L.J. v. K.S.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-27
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0359-20

    Defendant appealed from the entry of a FRO in favor of plaintiff, defendant's former girlfriend.

  • B.M.K. v. W.A.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-25
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2658-19

    Plaintiff, as guardian and biological father of S.K., appealed from the dismissal of his complaint against defendants.

  • K.G. v. B.N.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-25
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4051-19

    Defendant appealed from the FRO entered in favor of plaintiff.

  • A.M.D. v. K.E.F.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-25
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4395-19

    Defendant appealed the FRO entered in favor of plaintiff.

  • People v. Cremeans

    Publication Date: 2021-05-21
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Respondent: Bradley W. Oastler of Counsel, William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: Nathaniel V. Riley of Counsel, Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse.
    Case Number: KA20-00419

    Defendant's NH Conviction Tantamount to NY Offense Under Essential Elements Test

  • M.C.S. v. J.C.K.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-20
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0109-20

    Defendant appealed the FRO issued in favor of his former girlfriend.

  • K.L. v. A.L.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-18
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2684-19

    Defendant appealed from the denial of her motion for reconsideration of the trial court's order ruling that plaintiff's recent psychiatric commitment did not constitute changed circumstances warranting modification of the parties' custody and visitation agreement.

  • In the Matter of Majd M. Ghanayem.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-17
    Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Supreme Court
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Wolanda R. Shelton, Paula J. Frederick, Jenny K. Mittelman, William Dallas NeSmith, (State Bar of Georgia), Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Majd M Ghanayem, (The MMG Law Firm), Abilene, for appellee. Anthony B. Askew, (Chair, Review Panel), Atlanta, Bridget B. Bagley, Atlanta, for other party.
    Case Number: S21Y0705

    Disbarment Is Appropriate Sanction in Reciprocal Discipline Matter That Arose Out of Disbarment Entered in Texas

  • In the Matter of Misty Oaks Paxton.

    Publication Date: 2021-05-17
    Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Supreme Court
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James E. Spence, Jr., (Wilson, Morton & Downs, LLC), Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: James Stephen Lewis, Paula J. Frederick, Jenny K. Mittelman, William Dallas NeSmith, (State Bar of Georgia), Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S21Y0696

    Imposition of Review Board Reprimand Is the Appropriate Sanction in Disciplinary Matter Against Solo Practitioner