Filter This View

  • John's v. Wahlen

    Publication Date: 2008-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-16
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge: Kelly, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-4131

    PUBLISHBefore KELLY, McCONNELL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.Plaintiff-Appellant Doctor John's, Inc. appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant-Appellee City of Roy ("City"

  • In Re Christina Whipple Original Mandamus Proceeding

    Publication Date: 2012-02-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-16
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-12-00051-CV

     OPINIONOpinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, JusticeSitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, JusticePETITION FOR

  • April 3, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Multiple Uses Must Be Considered in Products Liability Cases

    The state Supreme Court has ruled that a court conducting a risk-utility analysis of an allegedly defective product with more than one intended use should consider all of those uses, rather t

    1 minute read

  • Hertz Corp. v. Friend

    Publication Date: 2010-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-23
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 08-1107

    THE HERTZ CORPORATION, PETITIONER v.MELINDA FRIEND et al.No. 08–1107In

  • Carlos Pena, Plaintiff v. Madelaine Chocolate, Defendant, 10 Civ. 4067

    Publication Date: 2012-09-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Barbara S. Jones
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 4067

    Cite as: Pena v. Chocolate, 10 Civ. 4067, NYLJ 1202571064863, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 7, 2012)District Judge Barbara S. Jone

  • Speigner v. Alexander

    Publication Date: 2001-05-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-24
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: BIRCH and HULL, Circuit Judges, and TIDWELL, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. BIRCH, Circuit Judge:In this opinion, we decide whether a suit for injunctive relief based on a personnel decision

  • October 9, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Supreme Court Disbars Attorney Who Stole From Judge

    The state Supreme Court has disbarred a Philadelphia attorney who was found to have commingled client funds with his own money — in one instance, spending away a Philadelphia municipal c

    1 minute read

  • November 1, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    'Golub' Notices

    Sections 2524.4 and 2524.5 of the Rent Stabilization Code provide, inter alia, that an owner can refuse to renew a tenant's stabilized lease on such grounds as non-primary residence, owner occ

    1 minute read

  • Mullins v. City of NY, 09-3435-cv

    Publication Date: 2011-08-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Newman, Calabresi, Katzmann, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Stephen P. Younger (Catherine A. Williams, A. Leah Vickers, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, New York; Gregory K. McGillivary, Woodley & McGillivary, Washington D.C.; Andrew Quinn, Quinn & Mellea, White Plains, New York, on the brief), Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Karen M. Griffin, Assistant Corporation Counsel (Francis F. Caputo, James Lemonedes, on the brief), for Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 09-3435-cv

    Cite as: Mullins v. City of NY, 09-3435-cv, NYLJ 1202510312037, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 5, 2011)Before: Newman, Calabresi, Katzmann, C.JJ.p cl

  • September 29, 2011 | New York Law Journal

    N.Y. Prostitution Promotion Ruled Out as Grounds for Deportation

    A conviction for third-degree promotion of prostitution under New York state law does not warrant an immigrant's removal from the United States, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday. The

    1 minute read