Filter This View

  • Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding Before: WALLACE, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr., Christopher Wion, Shane P. Cramer, Danielson Harrigan Leyh & Tollefson LLP, Seattle, WA; David T. Pritikin, Constantine L. Treta, Jr., Richard A. Cederoth, Robert N. Hochman, Nathaniel C. Love, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL; Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C.; T. Andrew Culbert, David E. Killough, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, attorneys for Appellee.
    for defendant: Derek L. Shaffer, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington D.C.; Kathleen M. Sullivan, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for Appellants.
    Case Number: No. 12-35352

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11223MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation,Plaintiff - Appellee,v.MOTOROLA,

  • May 30, 2007 | Daily Report Online

    High court backs 11th Circuit on employment discrimination

    ATLANTA'S FEDERAL appeals court figured prominently in Tuesday's action at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the nation's highest court affirming by a 5-4 vote the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appea

    1 minute read

  • August 28, 2008 | Daily Report Online

    Panel Upholds 'Privileged Material' Ruling Against Mohawk

    Lawyers for Mohawk Industries Inc. must give a former employee information they had argued was protected by attorney-client privilege, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. A three-j

    1 minute read

  • May 25, 2007 | Daily Report Online

    Local lawyer's sign case may be picked by high court

    TWO CASES WITH GEORGIA ties-one about free speech and billboards, the other about the state's method of taxing railroads-are among the matters that may have a shot at being heard by the U.S.

    1 minute read

  • Ascendant Anesthesia PLLC and v. Abazi

    Publication Date: 2011-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-08-02
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Douglas S. Lang Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-11-00115-CV

    REVERSED, RENDERED, and REMANDED;OPINIONBefore Justices Richter, Lang, and FillmoreOpinion By Justice LangIn this interlocutory appeal, Ascendant Anesthesia PLLC ("Ascendant") and

  • August 28, 2008 | Daily Report Online

    Panel upholds 'privileged material' ruling against Mohawk

    Lawyers for Mohawk Industries Inc. must give a former employee information they had argued was protected by attorney-client privilege, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. A t

    1 minute read

  • Gulf Insurance Company v. Transatlantic Reinsurance Company

    Publication Date: 2004-12-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Williams, JJ. 4762 Gulf Insurance Company, plf-ap, v. Transatlantic Reinsurance Company def-res, Employers Reinsurance Compa

  • September 5, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    L�pez Torres, plaintiffs-appellees v.New York State Board of Elections, defendants-appellants

    Decided Aug. 30, 2006Before Straub, Sotomayor, and Hall, C.JJ.[Appendix and Maps Deleted for Publication] Appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction by the Un

    1 minute read

  • In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation

    Publication Date: 2012-07-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos F. Lucero,* Consuelo M. Callahan, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph R. Saveri, Brendan P. Glackin, and Andew S. Kingsdale, Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, California; Merrill G. Davidoff (argued), Bart D. Cohen, and Michael J. Kane, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    for defendant: W. Stephen Smith and Deanne E. Maynard (argued), Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert S. Stern and Sylvia Rivera, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor-in-interest to Bank One, N.A. Sonya D. Winner (argued) and Anita F. Stork, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Bank of America, N.A. Stephen V. Bomse, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Suntrust Bank, Inc. David F. Graham and Eric H. Grush, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for defendants-appellees Citibank, N.A. and Citibank (West), FSB. Jack R. Nelson, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wachovia Corp. Daniel M. Wall and Joshua N. Holian, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, California, and Donald I. Baker, Baker & Miller, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Servus Financial Corp. Peter E. Moll and Brian D. Wallach, Cadwalader, Wickcersham & Taft LLP, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Concord EFS, Inc. and First Data Corp.
    Case Number: No. 10-17354

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7847 In re: ATM FEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, PAMELA BRENNAN; TERRY CRAYTON; DARLA MARTINEZ, Plaintiffs-Appel

  • December 1, 2000 | Legal Times

    Did Judge's Public Comments on Microsoft Go Too Far?

    With one significant exception, the Microsoft Corp.'s brief in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit sticks to typical antitrust matters and technology talk, such as the code

    1 minute read