Filter This View

  • Cholowsky v Civiletti

    Publication Date: 2009-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2007-08848

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department MARK C. DILLON, J.P. DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO JOHN M. LEVENTHAL CHERYL

  • Worldmark v. Wyndham Resort Development Corporation

    Publication Date: 2010-08-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-23
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Phillipi & Nutt, LLP, Steven J. Renshaw, Steven V. Phillipi, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Jessica Morton and Holly Brooks.
    for defendant: Beam, Brobeck, West, Borges & Rosa LLP, Fredrick M. Borges, John E. West, Andrew W. Salmond, Glen A. Stebens, for Defendant and Respondent Thousand Oaks Surgical Hospital, L.P.
    Case Number: No. C061019

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11072 WORLDMARK, THE CLUB, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WYNDHAM RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI

  • Ariel (UK) Limited v. Reuters Group PLC, 05 Civ. 9646

    Publication Date: 2007-02-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-01-24
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: John Keenan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05 Civ. 9646

    District Judge John F. Keenan Judge Keenan U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Defendants have filed motions for attorneys' fees and costs und

  • In re Orshansky

    Publication Date: 2008-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-10
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Ruiz, Associate Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For appellant Jane Pollack: George Teitelbaum, Wheaton, Md.
    for defendant: For appellee: Harry Jordan, pro se.
    Case Number: Nos. 04-PR-1317 & 05-PR-209

    Argued May 25, 2006Before RUIZ and REID, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.The matter of Ms. Mollie Orshansky's conservatorship first came before this court in 2002, when we ruled that t

  • William McCarthy v. New York City Technical College of City University of New York

    Publication Date: 2000-02-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-02-04
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: NEWMAN, LEVAL, and WEXLER
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph E. Gulmi et al., for Plaintiff-Appellant
    for defendant: Thomas Litsky et al., for Defendants-Appellees
    Case Number: No. 97-9243

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.Before: NEWMAN and LEVAL, Circuit Judges, and WEXLER, District Judge.[FOOTNOTE 1]

  • Association of Communications Enterprises v. Federal Communications Commission

    Publication Date: 2001-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-01-09
    Court: DC Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Silberman, Senior Circuit Judge: The Association of Communications Enterprises appeals from a

  • February 28, 2011 | Alm

    'Intentional Rightsizing' in '09 Pays Off for Firm in 2010

    ATLANTA - Sutherland didn't just regain lost financial ground - plus some - in 2010, posting revenue of $290.9 million, an 8 percent gain over the prior year. The firm's equity

    1 minute read

  • People v Martin

    Publication Date: 2008-03-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 02460

    Decided on March 18, 2008 No. 30 [*1]The People & c., Respondent, v Jose Martin Taveras, Also Known as Jose Martin Tavares, Also K

  • S.M. v. E.P.

    Publication Date: 2010-05-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-25
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Niesar & Vestal, Peter L. Vestal, John A. Kelley, Ward & Ward, Alexandra S. Ward, Nichols Professional Law Corp. and Alan Nichols for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Hall & Bailey and John L. Bailey for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. D055230

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6494S.M., Plaintiff and Appellant, v.E.P., Defendant and Respondent.N

  • Perceptron, Inc., Plaintiff v. Silicon Video, Inc. and Panavision Imaging, Inc., Defendants, 5:06-CV-0412 (GTS/DEP)

    Publication Date: 2010-09-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: Jean M. Westlake, Esq., Of Counsel, DeFrancisco & Falgiatano Law Firm, Syracuse, New York Counsel for Plaintiff: Michael J. Lavoie, Esq., Of Counsel, Butzel Long Tighe Patton PLLC, Detroit, Michigan.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendants: Edward S. Bloomberg, Esq., Of Counsel, Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo, New York Counsel for Defendants: Richard E. Honen, Esq., Of Counsel, Phillips Lytle LLP, Albany, New York
    Case Number: 5:06-CV-0412 (GTS/DEP)

    Cite as: Perceptron, Inc. v. Silicon Video, Inc., 5:06-CV-0412 (GTS/DEP), NYLJ 1202471548483, at *1 (NDNY, Decided August 27, 2010)District Judge Glenn T. Sudda