Filter This View

  • September 27, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names

    1 minute read

  • June 13, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Reinstatement of Attorneys

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection declares that the following attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of R.1:28:2 and R.1:20-1, are eligible to practice law in New

    1 minute read

  • October 2, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names

    1 minute read

  • February 20, 2009 | Law.com Corporate

    Candidates Who Passed The February 2009 NYS Bar Exam

    The New York State Board of Law Examiners announced yesterday that grading has been completed for the February 2009 bar examination. Graduates of ABA-approved law schools taking

    1 minute read

  • Ritchie v. Rupe

    Publication Date: 2011-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-03-28
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Jim Moseley Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-08-00615-CV

    Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Reverse and Remand in partOPINIONBefore Justices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Lang-MiersOpinion By Justice MoseleyThis case involves claims

  • August 8, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    July 31 to August 6, 2008 STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE - ENVIRONMENT 17-2-1320 I/M/O Freshwater Wetlands Letters of Inter

    1 minute read

  • May 17, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Successful Bar Candidates

    Supreme Court of New Jersey Listed below are the names of successful candidates from the February 2004 New Jersey Bar Examination. Of the 1,150 candidates who sat for this examination

    1 minute read

  • Murray v. Motorola, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-29
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Thompson, Associate Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 07-CV-1074, 07-CV-1075, 07-CV-1076, 07-CV-1077, 07-CV-1078 & 07-CV-1079

    Argued January 23, 2009Before KRAMER, FISHER and THOMPSON, Associate Judges.This appeal presents the question of whether federal law preempts any or all of plaintiffs'/appellants' numerous cause

  • Shemian v. Research in Motion Litd, 11 Civ. 4068 (RJS)

    Publication Date: 2013-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Richard J. Sullivan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff is represented: By David A.P. Brower of Brower Piven, New York, N.Y.
    for defendant: Defendants are represented: By Jay B. Kasner, Jessica Anne Barcus, and Scott D. Musoff of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, N.Y.
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 4068 (RJS)

    Cite as: Shemian v. Research in Motion Litd, 11 Civ. 4068 (RJS), NYLJ 1202594511968, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 28, 2013)District Judge Richard J. Su

  • In re: WTC Disaster Site

    Publication Date: 2005-07-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT Kearse and Cabranes, C.JJ., and Korman, Ch.D.J.* * Appeals by defendants from so much of an order of the United States District Co