Filter This View

  • Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United States

    Publication Date: 1999-11-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-11-10
    Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    Judge: Lourie, Rader, and Bryson, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark K. Neville, Jr.
    for defendant: Barbara M. Epstein, et al.
    Case Number: No. 98-1546

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.Carl Zeiss, Inc. appeals from the June 23, 1998 decision of the United States Court of International Trade d

  • September 27, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Reinstatement of Attorneys From 2011 Pro Hac Vice Ineligible List

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of Rule 1:28-2, are eligible to appear pro hac vice in New Je

    1 minute read

  • New York County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Lucy BillingsAlmonte v. NYCHA (104316/10)—Motion Disposed As IndicatedJustice

  • September 19, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Superior Ct. Weighs Smoking Reference in Med Mal Case

    Lawyers sparred Wednesday in a Superior Court oral argument over whether a curative jury instruction could blunt the impact of a patient's history of smoking in a medical malpractice

    1 minute read

  • Bronx County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-11-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Sharon A. M. AaronsRicketts v. Cuffe Auto Sales (306836/09)& Pd - Referred To Another JudgeTai v. Henry (303847/12)&

  • August 13, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Letter to Expert's Employer Not 'Sinister,' Defense Argues

    A defense attorney's letter to the employer of a medical malpractice plaintiffs expert was written to alert the employer that one of its experts professed an opinion that could reflect a chan

    1 minute read

  • People v. Adrian Thomas, 103008

    Publication Date: 2012-03-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
    Judge: Before: Spain, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Respondent: Richard J. McNally, District Attorney, Troy (Gordon Eddy of counsel).
    for defendant: For Appellant: Jerome K. Frost, Public Defender, Troy.
    Case Number: 103008

    Cite as: People v. Adrian Thomas, 103008, NYLJ 1202546763858, at *1 (App. Div., 3rd, Decided March 22, 2012)Before: Spain, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Ste

  • Suffolk County Second Department,

    Publication Date: 2012-08-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Paul J. Baisley, JrDepasquale v. Prianti Farms, Inc. (11/2285-OT)—Motion GrantedMeskin v. Super Stop & Shop (12/220-OT)&

  • November 1, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    New Trial Awarded After Expert's Smoking Reference

    A Philadelphia judge has granted a new trial in a medical malpractice case over an alleged delayed diagnosis of lung cancer after a defense expert testified in violation of the court's order

    1 minute read

  • People v. Turnage

    Publication Date: 2010-04-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-01
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Stephen G. Herndon, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Paul E. O?Connor, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Peggy A. Headley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number:

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4102THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.BARRY ALLEN TURNAGE, Defendant and Appell