Filter This View

  • In re Valdez

    Publication Date: 2010-07-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-08
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Appellant: Marilee Marshall, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner Alfredo Reyes Valdez.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Respondent: Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderson and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Keith H. Borjon, Sharlene A. Honnaka and Carl N. Henry, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent State of California.
    Case Number: No. S107508

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8847IN RE ALFREDO REYES VALDEZ, on Habeas Corpus. No. S107508 In The Supreme Court Of Calif

  • January 8, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Simpson Thacher Tops List of U.S. M&A Firms

    The value of U.S. announced mergers and acquisitions activity increased by almost 20 percent in 2003, reflecting a strong surge in dealmaking in the fourth quarter, according to figures releas

    1 minute read

  • Queens County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Augustus C. AgateKim v. Han (21240/11)—Case DisposedLedoux v. Camilien (13740/09)—Motion GrantedJust

  • Bronx County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-06-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Sharon A. M. AaronsMelo De Diaz v. 1425 Holding Llc (306754/08) 151;Motion DeniedO'Brien v. Prestige Bay Plaza (300336/09)

  • In re Williams

    Publication Date: 2010-11-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-09
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge: Rasure, Bankruptcy Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: CO-10-020

    PUBLISHOPINIONSubmitted on the briefs:*fn1Before THURMAN, RASURE, and SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judges.Appellant Paul Chayne Williams ("Williams") appeals the or

  • Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Rachel Amy AdamsCampbell v. Campbell (53073/12)—Motion Gr onzales v. Berrios (51874/12)—Motion Gr

  • Westcom Corporation v. Dedicated Private Connections, LLC

    Publication Date: 2004-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin, Friedman, JJ. 2888 Westcom Corporation, plf-res, v. Dedicated Private Connections, LLC def-ap ____________________

  • April 15, 2010 | Daily Report Online

    Stimulus boosts work for real estate lawyers

    In a market largely bereft of real estate deals, federal stimulus programs are creating work for dirt lawyers-and tax and bond counsel, too. Althea J.K. Broughton of Arnall Golden Gre

    1 minute read

  • The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff v. Dashawn Hines and Shameek Thomas, Defendants, 1861/09

    Publication Date: 2010-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Queens County, Part-JHO
    Judge: Judicial Hearing Officer Arthur J. Cooperman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Motion To: Suppress Physical Evidence (Mapp/Dunaway hearing) For People: Julie Trivedi, Esq., Ada
    for defendant: For Defendant Hines: Jeffrey Cohen, Esq. For Defendant Thomas: Meggan Ways, Esq.
    Case Number: 1861/09

    Cite as: People v. Hines, 1861/09, NYLJ 1202473312045, at *1 (Sup., QU, Decided September 29, 2010)Judicial Hearing Officer Arthur J. Coopermanp class="dec

  • Crawford v. West Virginia Governor's Office

    Publication Date: 2010-02-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-04
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 91-3044(L) (CA-91-106-5)

    ORDERThe Court modifies the opinion in this case by redacting the social security numbers of the appellees included in the caption of the case in docket number 91-3047.UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATE