Filter This View

  • People v Richardson

    Publication Date: 2009-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 536

    Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta, DeGrasse, JJ. 536 Ind. 4513/07 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Richardson, Defendant-App

  • March 29, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    West Virginia Supreme Court Cuts $100 Million from Punitive Damages Award Against DuPont. So Why Is DuPont Disappointed?

    Short answer: because after an appeal to the West Virginia state supreme court, it's still on the hook for about $97 million in punitive damages, $55 million in property damages, and $130 million in m

    1 minute read

  • June 1, 2013 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    American
US Airways William Douglas Parker finally signed an agreement to merg irways Group Inc. with another major airline after years of trying. Th

    1 minute read

  • November 4, 2002 | Legal Times

    Civil Actions

    The following selected cases were recently filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the Eastern District of Virginia, and in Greenbelt, Md. This information was provid

    1 minute read

  • Schram Construction, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California

    Publication Date: 2010-08-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-24
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Leonidou & Rosin, Janette G. Leonidou and A. Robert Rosin for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Charles F. Robinson, Stephen P. Morrell, David E. Bergquist, University of California, Office of the General Counsel for Defendant and Respondent The Regents of the University of California. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Raymond M. Buddie, Rick W. Grady for Defendant and Respondent DPR Construction, Inc. Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, M. Lois Bobak, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. A125808

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11151SCHRAM CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY O

  • Fait v. New Faze Development, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-27
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Glenn A. Fait and Elizabeth Colegrove, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Kilpatrick Law Offices and Terence Kilpatrick; Real Estate Law Group and Jason L. Hoffman, for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. C067630

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7320 DONNA FAIT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NEW FAZE DEVELOPMENT, INC., et a

  • December 13, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Attorneys in Compliance With IOLTA

    The IOLTA Fund of the Bar of New Jersey declares that the following attorneys have satisfied the requirement of R. 1:28A-2(a) and their names are hereby removed from the order of the New Jerse

    1 minute read

  • People v. Robert E. Lilley

    Publication Date: 2003-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: City Court, Nassau County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Conner THOMAS v. COUNTY OF PUTNAM — Plaintiff Richard F. Thomas brings the instant action against defendants County of m, m County District Attorney’s Office,

  • January 30, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Photo Essay: State Bar Annual Meeting

    More than 5,000 attorneys attended the New York State Bar Association's annual meeting this week at the Marriott Marquis in Times Square. Amidst the dozens of programs and s

    1 minute read

  • July 19, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Reinstatement of Attorneys

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of R. 1:28-2 and R. 1:20-1, are eligible to practice law in Ne

    1 minute read