Filter This View

  • (In Re: New York Skyline, Inc.) ,09-10181

    Publication Date: 2010-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-10
    Court: Bankruptcy Court, New York County
    Judge: Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: ATTORNEYS FOR EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COMPANY L.L.C., EMPIRE STATE BUILDING, INC., AND EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.: OF COUNSEL, DAVID S. TANNENBAUM, ESQ., FRANCINE S. NISIM, ESQ., KAREN S. FRIEMAN, ESQ., STERN TANNENBAUM & BELL LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK AND OF COUNSEL: RUDOLPH J. DIMASSA, ESQ., WILLIAM C. HEUER, ESQ., DUANE MORRIS LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK
    for defendant: ATTORNEYS FOR NEW YORK SKYLINE, INC.: OF COUNSEL: MARK FRANKEL, ESQ., BACKENROTH FRANKEL & KRINSKY, LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK AND OF COUNSEL: CHARLES A. STEWART, III, ESQ., FRANK S. OCCHIPINTI, ESQ., STEWART OCCHIPINTI, LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK
    Case Number: 09-10181

    Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein06/21/10ATTORNEYS FOR EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COMPANY L.L.C., EMPIRE STATE BUILDING, INC., A

  • (, ,In Re: New York Skyline, Inc.), 09-10181

    Publication Date: 2010-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Bankruptcy Court, New York County
    Judge: Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: ATTORNEYS FOR EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COMPANY L.L.C., EMPIRE STATE BUILDING, INC., AND EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.: OF COUNSEL, DAVID S. TANNENBAUM, ESQ., FRANCINE S. NISIM, ESQ., KAREN S. FRIEMAN, ESQ., STERN TANNENBAUM & BELL LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK AND OF COUNSEL: RUDOLPH J. DIMASSA, ESQ., WILLIAM C. HEUER, ESQ., DUANE MORRIS LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK
    for defendant: ATTORNEYS FOR NEW YORK SKYLINE, INC.: OF COUNSEL: MARK FRANKEL, ESQ., BACKENROTH FRANKEL & KRINSKY, LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK AND OF COUNSEL: CHARLES A. STEWART, III, ESQ., FRANK S. OCCHIPINTI, ESQ., STEWART OCCHIPINTI, LLP, NEW YORK, NEW YORK
    Case Number: 09-10181

    BANKINGIn Re: New York Skyline, Inc.09-10181Bankruptcy Court, New York CountyBankruptcy Judge

  • Hilton Head Holdings b.v. v. Peck

    Publication Date: 2012-12-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Katherine Forrest
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 7768 (KBF)

    Cite as: Hilton Head Holdings b.v. v. Peck, 11 Civ. 7768 (KBF), NYLJ 1202581363601, at *1 (SDNY, Decided November 20, 2012)District Judge Katherine F

  • June 18, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Firms Attract Drug Companies' Product Liability, Securities Cases

    While product liability cases against and government investigations into drug manufacturers have garnered much attention lately, securities litigators have had their fair share of work as well.

    1 minute read

  • September 27, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    United States, appellee v. Jorge Villafuerte, defendant-appellant

    Decided Sept. 21, 2007Before Walker and Cabranes, C.JJ., and Goldberg, J.*Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Gary L.

    1 minute read

  • November 23, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    PaLAW 2009 Top 100 Firms

    These are the Top 100 Firms by Size

    1 minute read

  • August 1, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Big Deals

    BLACKROCK/BARCLAYS BlackRock, Inc., announced on June 11 that it had agreed to pay Barclays plc $13.5 billion in cash and st

    1 minute read

  • September 3, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Fiscal Powers of Govenor and Legislature Debated

    Albany � A legal and political tug-of-war between two branches of government came before the Third Department yesterday, when an appellate panel heard a critical case involving the respective

    1 minute read

  • February 23, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    High Court Suspends Brooklyn Surrogate The Court of Appeals yesterday suspended Brooklyn Surrogate Michael H. Feinberg with pay pending a ruling on whether the judge sho

    1 minute read

  • January 23, 2001 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Following 'Rue,' Worker Sees Title VII Claim Advance

    Finding that the doctrine of collateral estoppel cannot be applied in a sex discrimination case to the previous findings of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Appeal Board, a federal j

    1 minute read