Filter This View

  • Sato v. Orange County Department of Education

    Publication Date: 2017-06-29
    Practice Area: Education Law | Government | Employment Litigation
    Industry: State and Local Government | Education
    Date Filed: 2017-06-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding Before: Richard C. Tallman and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Stephen Joseph Murphy III,*District Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas A. Ames (argued), Ames Law Office, Fountain Valley, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Jeffrey P. Thompson (argued) and Gregory A. Wille, Declues Burkett & Thompson APC, Huntington Beach, California, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Case Number: No. 15-56402

    Assembly Bill 97 did not deprive California school districts of Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit (Tallman, J.)

  • Tohono O'odham Nation v. State of Arizona

    Publication Date: 2015-11-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2015-11-06
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Before: DOROTHY W. NELSON, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Danielle Spinelli (argued), Seth P. Waxman, and Sonya Lebsack, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jonathan L. Jantzen and Laura Berglan, Tohono O'odham Nation Office of the Attorney General, Sells, Arizona, for Plaintiff-Appellee / Cross-Appellant.
    for defendant: Evan F. Hiller (argued) and Michael Tryon, Arizona Office of the Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona, for Defendant-Appellant State of Arizona / Cross-Appellee.
    Case Number: No. 11-16811 No. 11-16833

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 12022 TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CI

  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS, Defendant - Appellant

    Publication Date: 2014-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-07-30
    Court: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    Judge: KING
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 13-70025

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUITUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. SHERMAN LAMONT FIELD

  • Graham-Sult v. Clainos

    Publication Date: 2013-12-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-12-27
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Claudia Wilken, Chief District Judge, Presiding Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James J. Brosnahan (argued) and Kevin A. Calia, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, California; Therese Y. Cannata, Carolyn A. Johnston and Rachel L. Kent, Cannata, Ching & O'Toole, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: Nancy L. Tompkins (argued), James M. Wagstaffe and Ivo Labar, Kerr & Wagstaffe, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellee Nicholas P. Clainos. Jerome B. Falk, Jr. (argued) and Jonathan W. Hughes, Arnold & Porter, San Francisco, California; Ronald E. Mallen and Cassidy E. Chivers, Hinshaw & Culbertson, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellees Richard L. Greene, Linda McCall, and Greene Radovsky Maloney Share & Hennigh LLP. Thomas Patrick Lane (argued) and Michael S. Elkin, Winston & Strawn, New York, New York; Erin R. Ranahan and Drew A. Robertson, Winston & Strawn, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants-Appellees Bill Graham Archives LLC DBA Wolfgang's Vault, Norton LLC, and William Sagan.
    Case Number: No. 11-16779 No. 12-15892

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 13973 ALEXANDER GRAHAM-SULT; DAVID GRAHAM, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

  • United States v. Burtton

    Publication Date: 2010-04-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-02
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: Smith, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-1380

    Submitted: November 18, 2009Before MURPHY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.Taft Burtton was charged in a two-count indictment with possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mi

  • In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation

    Publication Date: 2012-07-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos F. Lucero,* Consuelo M. Callahan, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph R. Saveri, Brendan P. Glackin, and Andew S. Kingsdale, Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, California; Merrill G. Davidoff (argued), Bart D. Cohen, and Michael J. Kane, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    for defendant: W. Stephen Smith and Deanne E. Maynard (argued), Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert S. Stern and Sylvia Rivera, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor-in-interest to Bank One, N.A. Sonya D. Winner (argued) and Anita F. Stork, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Bank of America, N.A. Stephen V. Bomse, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Suntrust Bank, Inc. David F. Graham and Eric H. Grush, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for defendants-appellees Citibank, N.A. and Citibank (West), FSB. Jack R. Nelson, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wachovia Corp. Daniel M. Wall and Joshua N. Holian, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, California, and Donald I. Baker, Baker & Miller, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Servus Financial Corp. Peter E. Moll and Brian D. Wallach, Cadwalader, Wickcersham & Taft LLP, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Concord EFS, Inc. and First Data Corp.
    Case Number: No. 10-17354

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7847 In re: ATM FEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, PAMELA BRENNAN; TERRY CRAYTON; DARLA MARTINEZ, Plaintiffs-Appel

  • Renfro v. The Funky Door Long Term Disability Plan

    Publication Date: 2012-06-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-18
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding Before: M. Margaret McKeown and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, Senior District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sharon Delfino Green, William Green (argued), Jennifer de la Campa, Defino Green & Green, San Rafael, California, for plaintiff-appellant Jeff Renfro.
    for defendant: Kevin Gill (argued) and Anna M. Martin, Rimac Martin, PC, Incline Village, Nevada, for defendants-appellees The Funky Door Long Term Disability Plan and The ServiceMaster Long Term Disability Plan.
    Case Number: No. 11-15301

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6675 JEFF RENFRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE FUNKY DOOR LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and

  • Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees

    Publication Date: 2002-04-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-04
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Jerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-10538

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of TexasI.A union appeals an injunction issued under the Railway Labor Act ("RLA"). The six appellee railroad carriers have