Search Results

December 13, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

Attorneys Reinstated From 2011 Ineligible List

The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of the annual assessment, are hereby removed from the li

1 minute read

Swenson v. County of Los Angeles

Publication Date: 1999-10-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 1999-10-18
Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate Dis
Judge: EPSTEIN, J.,VOGEL (C.S.), P.J., and CURRY, J.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Norman Pine, et.al
for defendant: Clyde Lockwood, et al.
Case Number: No. B118613

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Appellant County of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Cod

Lefever v. K.P. Hovnanian Enters., Inc.

Publication Date: 1999-07-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 1999-07-29
Court: In the Supreme Court of New Jersey
Judge: CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ, JUSTICES HANDLER and STEIN, JUSTICE O'HERN
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dennis S. Brotman
for defendant: Steven I. Greene
Case Number: No. A- 211

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, J. This appeal concerns the meaning of the product-line ex

Overgard v Hobbs

Publication Date: 2007-06-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number:

ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, J.P. DAVID S. RITTER ROBERT A. LIFSON DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, JJ. Matthew Overgard, et al., respondents, v Kevin Hobbs, defendant, Birbrower, Montalbano, C

May 14, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

Successful Bar Candidates — February 2010 Bar Examination

Listed below are the results from the February 2010 New Jersey Bar Examination. Of the 935 candidates who sat for this examination, results have been mailed to 884 candidates. Of those, 507,

1 minute read

State v. Hackett

Publication Date: 2001-01-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2001-01-18
Court: Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey
Judge: LaVECCHIA, J.
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: A-53 SEPTEMBER T

ON APPEAL FROM Appellate Division, Superior CourtArgued September 12, 2000The issue in this appeal is whether the evidence adduced at the trial of a defendant accused of exposing himself to thre

Sachs v. Adeli, 603930/2003

Publication Date: 2006-09-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2006-08-21
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge: Karla Moskowitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 603930/2003

NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Attorney for plaintiff: Aaron Richard Golub, Esq. Attorney for defendant: Ballon, Stoll, Bader, Nadler P.C.

In re Novartis Wage and Hour Litigation, 09-0437-cv

Publication Date: 2010-07-08
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Kearse and Hall, C.JJ., Rakoff, D.J.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeremy Heisler, New York, New York (David W. Sanford, Katherine M. Kimpel, Sanford, Wittels & Heisler, Washington, D.C., Steven Wittels, Andrew Melzer, Sanford, Wittels & Heisler, New York, New York, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Jennifer R. Marion, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. (Carol A. De Deo, Deputy Solicitor for National Operations, William C. Lesser, Deputy Associate Solicitor, Paul L. Frieden, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for Amicus Curiae Secretary of Labor in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants. Outten & Golden, New York, New York (Justin M. Swartz, Rachel Bien, Outten & Golden, New York, New York, Catherine K. Ruckelshaus, National Employment Law Project, New York, New York, George A. Hanson, Bradley T. Wilders, Stueve Siegel Hanson, Kansas City, Missouri, Rebecca M. Hamburg, National Employment Lawyers Association, San Francisco, California, Richard J. (Rex) Burch, Bruckner Burch, Houston, Texas, of counsel), filed a brief on behalf of Amicus Curiae National Employment Lawyers Association in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants.
for defendant: Richard H. Schnadig, Chicago, Illinois (Vedder Price, Chicago, Illinois, Jonathan A. Wexler, Vedder Price, New York, New York, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellee. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Washington, D.C. (Neal D. Mollen, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Washington, D.C., Robin S. Conrad, Shane B. Kawka, National Chamber Litigation Center, Washington, D.C., of counsel), filed a brief on behalf of Amicus Curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of Defendant-Appellee.
Case Number: 09-0437-cv

Before: Kearse and Hall, C.JJ., Rakoff, D.J.*Decided: July 06, 2010Jeremy Heisler, New York, New York (David W. Sanford, Kathe

Cusimano v. Schnurr, 652429/11

Publication Date: 2013-07-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge: Justice Charles E. Ramos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Robert M. Calica, Esq., of Rosenberg Calica & Birney, LLP.
for defendant: For Defendants: Alan A. Helelr, Esq., of Heller Horowitz & Feit, P.C.
Case Number: 652429/11

Cite as: Cusimano v. Schnurr, 652429/11, NYLJ 1202611059680, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided July 3, 2013) 652429/11 Justice Charles E. Ramosp class

Avasthi & Associates Inc. v. Ashish K. Banik

Publication Date: 2011-05-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2011-05-17
Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
Judge: John S. Anderson Justice
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: NO. 14-09-01016-CV

Reversed and Remanded and Plurality and Dissenting Opinions filed May 17, 2011.PLURALITY OPINIONThis is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude