• Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. United States

    Publication Date: 2013-02-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard H. Gordon (argued), Beverly Hills, California and Philip J. Dichter, Malibu, California, for Appellants.
    for defendant: Sparkle Sooknanan (argued), Lindsey Powell, Mark B. Stern, and Tony West, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; and André Birotte, Jr., United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California, for Appellee.

    Case Number: No. 11-55577

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1654DICHTER-MAD FAMILY PARTNERS, LLP; PHILIP JAY DICHTER; CLAUDIA GVIRTZMAN DICHTER; RICHARD M. GORDON, Plaintiffs- Appellants,p

  • January 9, 2006 | Texas Lawyer

    Newsmakers

    NEW POSITIONS . . . Cox Smith Matthews has hired 17 new associates in its San Antonio office: Jared G. Andersen and Christopher Briggs, tax; Casey A. Burns, estate planning, probate an

    1 minute read

  • March 15, 2010 | The Recorder

    New Partners 2010: The List

    David Ach Jorgenson, Siegel, McClure & Flegel UC-Davis School of Law, 1977 Sophie Akins Best Best & Krieger Hasting

    1 minute read

  • May 15, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    NEW DEALS

    Lawyers on Major TransactionsSkadden, Kirkland & Ellis Counsel Sears' Purchase of Lands' EndIn a cash deal valued at about $1.9 billion, Hoffman Estates, Ill.-based retail gi

    1 minute read

  • April 21, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Topical Index to Articles

    please replace asterisks with bullets (option + 8) ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE * AOC Pulls Plug on Individual Calendar Plan for Essex Co.; by Henry Gottlieb, Feb. 3, p. 397.

    1 minute read

  • R&R Marine Inc. v. Max Access Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-26
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Charles Kreger Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 09-11-00396-CV

    OPINION Appellant, R&R Marine, Inc. challenges t al court‟s rendition of partial summary judgment in favor of Max Access, Inc.*fn1 and t

  • Foxgate Homeowners` Association , Inc. v. Bramalea California, Inc

    Publication Date: 2001-07-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-09
    Court: Cal. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: BAXTER, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. The questions we address here are independent of the issues in the underlying lawsuit. Instead, we face the intersect

  • May 16, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    decision of interestia pART 2Justice YorkNew York Public Interest Research Group Straphangers Campaign v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority - This is an arti

    1 minute read

  • November 17, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    An Independent Voice on the Board

    On July 8, 2008, the inaugural meeting of the Lead Directors Network took place in New York City, convening a select group of lead directors, presiding directors, and non-executive chair

    1 minute read

  • December 27, 2001 |

    A Year of Learning Limits

    During the late 1990s and into the early new millennium, intellectual property rights grew like a bodybuilder on steroids. Whether courts were passing on the legitimacy of business method patents or C

    1 minute read