Filter This View

  • April 20, 2009 | National Law Journal

    MOVERS

    LATERALS Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis (Los Angeles): Valentine Hoy joins the firm's litigation practice as partner in the

    1 minute read

  • Estate of Mercer K. Ellington v. EMI Music Publishing

    Publication Date: 2003-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Koeltl The defendants and interpleader plaintiffs, EMI Mills Music and Music Catalogue Partnership (collectivel

  • Smallwood v. Lupoli, 04-CV-0686

    Publication Date: 2007-09-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-09-14
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: Joseph Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-CV-0686

    District Judge Joseph F. Bianco U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK The attorney for plaintiffs is Edward G. Bailey, Esq., Bailey & Sherman, P

  • June 12, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Vergopia v. Shaker et al

    N.J. Supreme Court CORPORATIONS � Indemnity Vergopia v. Shaker et al A-10 September Term 2006; Supreme Court; per curiam opinion; dissent by Rivera-So

    1 minute read

  • October 26, 2009 | Law.com Corporate

    From A to Z, the D.C. Metro Area's 150 Largest Law Offices

       

    1 minute read

  • May 3, 2010 | National Law Journal

    The Starting Line

    Hogan Lovells is, as of Saturday, a reality — a 2,500-lawyer, 47-office megafirm that spans four continents. Now, the firm's leaders have to manage their leviathan and clean

    1 minute read

  • Chao v. Gotham Registry Inc., 06-2432-cv

    Publication Date: 2008-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-01-24
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Cardamone
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-2432-cv

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT Maria Van Buren, Washington, D.C. (Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Steven J. Mandel, Associate Solicitor, Paul L. Frieden, U.S. Departm

  • February 25, 2003 | Corporate Counsel

    California State Teachers' Retirement System v. Qwest et al.

    Hell hath no fury like an investor scorned. In an ongoing effort to recoup an estimated $184 million in stock losses, the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) has sued W

    1 minute read

  • March 13, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    New Deals: Lawyers on Major Transactions

    Wachtell, Davis Polk, Counsel Advertising Company Merger In a deal valued at about $3 billion, Paris-based advertising conglomerate Publicis Groupe SA announced last week

    1 minute read

  • Crews v. Willows Unified School District

    Publication Date: 2013-07-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-07-17
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI and Karl Olson for Plaintiff and Appellant. JOSEPH T. FRANCKE for William T. Bagley, Leland Yee and Californians Aware; DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, Duffy Carolan and Dan Laidman for First Amendment Coalition, California Newspaper Publishers Association, Los Angeles Times Communications, McClatchy Company, California Newspapers Partnership, The Orange County Register, Hearst Corporation and The Press-Enterprise as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, Donald A. Velez and Amy E. Hoyt; MATT JUHL DARLINGTON & ASSOCIATES and Matthew P. Juhl-Darlington for Defendants and Respondents. ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROME, A. Christopher Duran, Elizabeth P. Lind and Paul M. Loya for California School Boards Association's Education Legal Alliance as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Willows Unified School District et al.
    Case Number: No. C066633

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7590 TIM CREWS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLOWS UNIFIED SCHOOL