Filter This View

  • August 29, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Big Suits

    U.S. v. GSK In the largest health care fraud s ettlement in history, U.K. drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline plc agreed to pay a total of $

    1 minute read

  • Ardmore Inc. v. the Rex Group Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-04-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-19
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Laura Carter Higley Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 01-11-00328-CV

    OPINIONThis appeal concerns whether purchase options in two leases were properly exercised. Appellants, Ardmore, Inc. and Star Properties, LLC, appeal the trial court's grants of summa

  • Margel v. E.G.L. Gem Lab Ltd., 04 Civ. 1514

    Publication Date: 2010-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-08
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Henry Pitman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04 Civ. 1514

    Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Magistrate Judge Pitman OPINION

  • May 30, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Canadian Big Deals

    RBC/Ally CanadaRoyal Bank of Canada, the country's biggest bank, has grown its consumer lending business with the acquisition of Ally Credi

    1 minute read

  • Reid v. Google, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-08-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-05
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. S158965

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10019BRIAN REID, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant and Respondent.p

  • Posven, C.A. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

    Publication Date: 2004-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Plaintiff POSVEN, C.A. ("POSVEN") commenced this diversity action seeking damages for breach of a $39,375,000 performance bond ("Performance Bond" or "Bond") issued by defendant and third-party pla

  • Bacolitsas v. 86th & 3rd Owner, LLC

    Publication Date: 2013-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Sack, Hall, Lohier, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees: Adam Leitman Bailey, John M. Desiderio, William J. Geller, Courtney J. Killelea, on The Brief, Jeffrey R.Metz, New York, New York.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant: Adrienne B. Koch and Thomas M. Lopez, on The Brief, Mark Walfish, Katsky Korins LLP, New York, New York. And Defendant-Appellant Michael, Levitt & Rubinstein, LLC. For Amicus Curiae The U.S.A.1: Sarah S. Normand, Assistant United States Attorney, on The Brief, Li Yu, Assistant United States Attorney, New York, New York. For Amicus Curiae The Real Estate Board of New York., Robert D. Kaplan, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, New York.
    Case Number: 10-4229-cv(L); 10-5230-cv(CON)

    Cite as: Bacolitsas v. 86th & 3rd Owner, LLC, 10-4229-cv(L), NYLJ 1202585268983, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided December 19, 2012)Before: Sack, Hall, Lohier,

  • The People v. Petros Bedi, 4107/96

    Publication Date: 2013-03-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Queens County, Criminal Term Part K-18
    Judge: Acting Justice James Griffin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 4107/96

    Cite as: The People v. Petros Bedi, 4107/96, NYLJ 1202592836531, at *1 (Sup., QU, Decided March 13, 2013)Acting Justice James Griff

  • Samet v. Bedford Flushing Holding Corp.

    Publication Date: 2002-11-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2002-04998

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 1753f C/hu AD2d Argued - October 8, 2002 DAVID S. RITTER, J.P. p

  • September 27, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names

    1 minute read