Filter This View

  • June 14, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Reinstatement of Attorneys

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of R.1:28-2 and R.1:20-1, are eligible to practice law in New

    1 minute read

  • April 1, 2013 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    ICENYSEInterContinentalExchange Inc. is hoping that a friendly deal to acquire NYSE Euronext achieves what a hostile bid could not. ICE agreed o

    1 minute read

  • March 28, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Panel Determines Depraved Indifference Standard Changed With 'Payne' Ruling

    ALBANY - An appeals panel yesterday determined that the Court of Appeals reached a "point of no return" and made new law in its Oct. 19, 2004, ruling in

    1 minute read

  • May 15, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Office of Attorney Ethics Quarterly Discipline Report

    DISBARMENT (6) ATTORNEY ADMITTED LOCATION DECIDED EFFECTIVE Briguglio, Anthony J. 1984 New York 11/29/2005 11/29/2005 Kolmar, Jay Ronald 1990 Morris 11/01/2005 1

    1 minute read

  • World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles

    Publication Date: 2010-05-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-26
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rex S. Heinke, Michael C. Small, L. Rachel Helyar, Maria Ellinikos, and Christopher Blanchard of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP (Los Angeles, California) and Paul E. Fisher of the Law Offices of Paul E. Fisher (Newport Beach, C California) for plaintiffs-appellees World Wide Rush, LLC, et al. Gary S. Mobley of Case, Knowlson & Jordan, LLP (Newport Beach, California) for plaintiffs-appellees Sky Tag, Inc., et al.
    for defendant: Carmen A. Trutanich, Rockard J. Delgadillo, Jeri L. Burge, Kenneth T. Fong, Tayo A. Popoola, and Michael J. Bostrom of the Office of the City Attorney (Los Angeles, California) for defendant-appellant City of Los Angeles.
    Case Number: Nos. 08-56454, 08-56523, 09-55494, 09-55792, 09-55791

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6538WORLD WIDE RUSH, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company; INSITE OUTDOOR WORKS LA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaint

  • Mez Indus. v. Pacific Nat'l Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 1999-12-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-12-03
    Court: The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate
    Judge: CROSKEY, KLEIN, and KITCHING
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gauntlett & Associates for Plaintiff and Appellant
    for defendant: Edmund G. Farrell at al., for Defendant and Respondent
    Case Number: No. B121209

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.This case presents the question of whether a liability insurer providing coverage for "advertising injury" i

  • ISI Brands Inc. v. KCC Int'l Inc., 03 CV 1605

    Publication Date: 2006-10-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: Arthur Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03 CV 1605

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK APPEARANCES: Amster stein & Ebenstein, LLP Attorneys for the Plaintiff By: Chester P

  • June 6, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    The SEC's Setbacks in Litigation

    One of the most fought over quotes from football is: "Winning isn't everything. It's the only thing."[FOOTNOTE 1] By its recent track record in the litigation arena, the U.S. Secur

    1 minute read

  • Estate of Nettie Benenson, 4882/08

    Publication Date: 2009-10-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-14
    Court: Surrogate's Court, Kings County
    Judge: Diana Johnson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 4882/08

    Surrogate Diana A. Johnson KINGS COUNTY Surrogate's Court Surrogate Johnson

  • Mayor of the City of New York v. Council of the City of New York

    Publication Date: 2004-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Supreme Court IA Part 5 Justice Stallman In this action for injunctive and declaratory relief, plaintiffs challenge the validity of Local Law 36 (2002). a href="