Filter This View

  • People v. Thompson

    Publication Date: 2010-05-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-24
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Irene Kiebert, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
    for defendant: Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Holly D. Wilkens and Melissa Mandel, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    Case Number: S056891

    ppCite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6313THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.JAMES ALVIN THOMPSON, Defendant and Appellant.

  • New York County First Department SUPREME COURT — Published in the Law Journal on: November 14, 2011,

    Publication Date: 2011-11-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Lucy BillingsHuang-Chen v. NYC (107546/11)—Case DisposedGarcia v. NYC (116377/09)—Motion Disposed As Indicatedp class="sect

  • December 18, 2003 | Alm

    Complex Issues Delay Milberg Weiss Breakup

    The painstaking process of breaking up the giant plaintiffs' firm Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach is taking several months longer than expected due to a number of complications, sourc

    1 minute read

  • Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority)

    Publication Date: 2012-04-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-17
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside, John M. Bowman and C.J. Laffer for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: NOSSAMAN, Robert D. Thornton, John J. Flynn III, Robert C. Horton, Lauren�C. Valk and Lloyd W. Pellman for Defendants and Respondents Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority and Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority Board. Andrea S. Ordin, County Counsel, and Ronald W. Stamm, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board. Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, Tiffany K. Wright; Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart and Bradley R. Hogin for Southern California Association of Governments, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, Metropolitan Water District, San Joaquin Council of Governments, Madera County Transportation Commission, Riverside County Transportation Commission, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Orange County Transportation Authority, and San Francisco County Transportation Authority as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondents and Real Parties in Interest. Cox, Castle & Nicholson, Michael H. Zischke, Andrew B. Sabey and Rachel R. Jones for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondents and Real Parties in Interest. Carmen A. Trutanich, City Attorney, Andrew J. Nocas, Supervising City Attorney, Timothy McWilliams and Siegmund Shyu, Deputy City Attorneys, for City of Los Angeles as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondents and Real Parties in Interest.
    Case Number: No. B232655

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. NEIGHBORS FOR SMART RAIL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EXPOSITION METRO LINE CONSTRUCTI

  • April 8, 2013 | The Recorder

    Lawyers Discuss SEC's Social Media Disclosure Stance

    The Securities and Exchange Commission last week gave its quasi-blessing on disclosure through social media, but lawyers who counsel companies on disclosure of material information say it's u

    1 minute read

  • January 18, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Urge to Merge Continues: McKenna Long, Herbert Smith Eye New Nuptials

    On the heels of reports earlier this month that the surge in law firm mergers that marked 2011 would continue in 2012, further evidence suggests that tie-up talks are indeed slowly returning

    1 minute read

  • December 15, 2011 | International

    Chinese Law Firms Get Social on Weibo, 'China's Twitter'

    With Twitter and Facebook helping spread protest movements from the Arab Spring to Occupy Wall S

    1 minute read

  • May 23, 2011 | Daily Business Review

    Business lobby gets its wish list in legislative session

    Faced with high unemployment, stagnant growth and a cavernous budget shortfall, the Republican-dominated state Legislature opted for a prescription wish list from the business lobby this spri

    1 minute read

  • December 4, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    New York City Traffic Regulations As 'Some Evidence' of Negligence

    It is well established that if a violation of a statute is established at trial, the jury will be charged that the offending party was negligent.1 Thus, the non-offending party would be

    1 minute read

  • Giorgio Galluzzo, Petitioner-Appellant v. Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent, 08-6036-ag

    Publication Date: 2011-02-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Feinberg, B.D. Parker, and Wesley, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Amanda Gray, Bretz & Coven, LLP, New York, NY (David K. S. Kim, Matthew L. Guadagno, Jules E. Coven, Kerry W. Bretz, on the brief), for Petitioner-Appellant.
    for defendant: Briena Strippoli, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division (Justin R. Markel, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Assistant Director, on the brief), for Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 08-6036-ag

    Cite as: Galluzzo v. Holder, 08-6036-ag, NYLJ 1202479844628, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided January 26, 2011)Before: Feinberg, B.D. Parker, and Wesley, C.JJ.p cla