• April 7, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Defining 'Reliable Principles and Methods' of Experts

    Modern experts have powerful tools and technologies at their disposal. As powerful as these are, however, they are used by human beings -- fallible creatures who are sometimes undertrained and

    1 minute read

  • Surrogate's Court — Published in the Law Journal on: October 18, 2011,

    Publication Date: 2011-10-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    ESTATE OF TOM ROBERTS, Deceased (0908/08)—The proposed compromise of causes of action for decedent's conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death is approved.The restricti

  • August 29, 2013 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Ogletree Deakins Builds Connecticut Office

    Sometimes, the best business opportunities arise out of the most serendipitous of meetings. That was certainly the case for Marc Zaken, who met his new boss during an American Bar Ass

    1 minute read

  • April 5, 2013 | Daily Report Online

    Carlton Fields

    Not long ago, Carlton Fields could barely lay claim to the title of “Southeastern regional law firm.” It had one office in Atlanta and six in Florida. In October, it took a

    1 minute read

  • In re Somers and Caggiano, 10-38296

    Publication Date: 2011-05-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District
    Judge: Judge Cecelia G. Morris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10-38296

    Cite as: In re Somers and Caggiano, 10-38296, NYLJ 1202493746204, at *1 (SDNY, Decided May 4, 2011)Judge Cecelia G. MorrisDecided: May 4,

  • Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Publication Date: 2001-06-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-08
    Court: DC Cir.
    Judge: Sentelle, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 99-1268

    Argued March 23, 2001On Petitions for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection AgencyThis case involves multiple challenges to "Technical Amendments" to the "NOx SIP Call" rulemaking a

  • March 13, 2006 | National Law Journal

    A business contract case gets 'star' treatment

    Los Angeles-A California Supreme Court case that seeks to determine whether punitive damages apply in certain business contracts involving inventors has attracted a seemingly unlikely pa

    1 minute read

  • Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    Publication Date: 2010-07-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Leval, Pooler and Hall, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: CARTER PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC (R. Clark Wadlow, Jennifer Tatel, David S. Petron, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC; Ellen S. Agress, Maureen A. O'Connell, Fox Television Stations, Inc., New York, NY, on the brief), for petitioner Fox Television Stations, Inc. Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald G. London, Amber L. Husbands, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, DC; Jonathan H. Anschell, Susanna M. Lowy, CBS Broadcasting Inc., New York, NY, for petitioner CBS Broadcasting Inc. Seth P. Waxman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Zucker, ABC, Inc., New York, NY, for petitioners ABC, Inc., WLS Television, Inc., and KTRK Television, Inc. Wade H. Hargrove, Mark J. Prak, David Kushner, Julia Ambrose, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP, Raleigh, NC, for intervenor ABC Television Affiliates Association. Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Parul P. Desai, Matthew Wood, Media Access Project, Washington, DC, for intervenors Center for Creative Voices and Future of Music Coalition. Michael R. Patrick, Renzulli Law Firm, White Plains, NY; Robert M. O'Neil, J. Joshua Wheeler, Eisha Jain, The Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, for amici curiae The Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression and The Media Institute. Nancy Winkelman, Timothy K. Lewis, Carl A. Solano, Mark Fowler, Jerald Fritz, Henry Geller, Newton N. Minow, James H. Quello, Glen O. Robinson, Kenneth G. Robinson, Jr., Schnader Harrrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for amici curiae former FCC Commissioners and Officials. Christopher Hansen, Benjamin Sahl, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY, for amici curiae American Civil Liberties Union, New York Civil Liberties Union, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, Directors Guild of America, First Amendment Project, Minnesota Public Radio/American Public Media, National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture, the National Coalition Against Censorship, National Federation of Community Broadcasters, PEN American Center, Screen Actors Guild, Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts, Woodhull Freedom Foundation, Writers Guild of America, West, Writers Guild of America, East. Steven H. Aden, Patrick A. Trueman, Alliance Defense Fund, Washington, DC; Joel B. Campbell, Law Offices of Richard J. Yrulegui, Fresno, CA, for amici curiae Focus on the Family and Family Research Council. Robert W. Peters, Robin S. Whitehead, Morality in Media, Inc., New York, NY, for amicus curiae Morality in Media, Inc. Robert R. Sparks, Jr., Christopher T. Craig, Sparks & Craig, LLP, McLean, VA, for amicus curiae Parents Television Council. Thomas B. North, St. Ignace, MI, for amicus curiae Decency Enforcement Center for Television.
    for defendant: MIGUEL ESTRADA, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C., (Susan Weiner, NBC Universal, Inc., on the brief) for intervenors NBC Universal Inc. and NBC Telemundo License Co. JACOB LEWIS, Associate General Counsel, for Austin C. Schlick, General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. (Joseph R. Palmore, Deputy General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC; Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas M. Bondy, Anne Murphy, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, on the brief), for respondents.

    Case Number:

    Before: Leval, Pooler and Hall, C.JJ.Decided: July 13, 2010CARTER PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC (R. Clark Wadlow

  • April 3, 2003 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    The Case of the Vanishing Legal Opinions

    While the Connecticut General Assembly and the state Judicial Department spar over the practice of cloaking ongoing cases from public view, little attention is being paid to finished cases tha

    1 minute read

  • June 3, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Winning Complex Trials in Out-of-State Jurisdictions

    When trying a complex, bet-the-company case in an out-of-state jurisdiction, the conventional wisdom is that New York lawyers should rely heavily on local counsel to give their client a local

    1 minute read