Filter This View

  • Sa v. United States

    Publication Date: 2002-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-26
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Michel, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-1274

    Appeal from: United States Court of International TradeChief Judge Gregory W. CarmanOpinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge DYK.

  • March 27, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Today, Asia. Tomorrow. . .?

    It's been a year since a groundbreaking merger between China's King & Wood and Australia's Mallesons Stephens Jaques produced a new giant with nearly 1,600 lawyers and revenues of almost $800 m

    1 minute read

  • March 4, 2013 | International

    Today, Asia. Tomorrow . . .?

    It's been a year since a groundbreaking merger between China's King & Wood and Australia's Mallesons Stephen Jaques produced a new giant with nearly 1,600 lawyers and revenues of almost $

    1 minute read

  • October 9, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Fresh Recruits

    All that talk about law firms shifting their principal recruitment efforts toward lateral hires has apparently been unpersuasive in New Jersey. In this, the Law Journal's seventh annual

    1 minute read

  • July 16, 2006 | Law.com Corporate

    Candidates Who Passed The July 2006 NYS Bar Exam

    The New York State Board of Law Examiners has completed grading the papers written by applicants for admission to the Bar at the examination held on July 25-26, 2006. Of the 10,

    1 minute read

  • July 24, 2009 | Law.com Corporate

    Candidates Who Passed The July 2009 NYS Bar Exam

    More than 88 percent of graduates of American Bar Association-approved law schools who sat for the first time for the July 2009 bar exam passed the test. The 88.2 percent rate i

    1 minute read

  • October 23, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    IOLTA Ineligible List

    The Supreme Court has entered an Order declaring attorneys who have not complied with the mandatory IOLTA program to be administratively ineligible to practice law. The Court's Order, which takes

    1 minute read

  • November 4, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    IOLTA Ineligible List

    The Supreme Court has entered an Order declaring attorneys who have not complied with the mandatory IOLTA program to be administratively ineligible to practice law. The

    1 minute read

  • United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York, 06-3329-cv

    Publication Date: 2008-08-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-19
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Ralph Winter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-3329-cv

    Before: Winter, Miner, and Cabranes, C.JJ. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT Lewis D. Zirogiannis (Marc A. Weinstein on the brief), Hughes Hubbard & Reed

  • Gordon v. West Houston Trees Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2011-04-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Evelyn V. Keyes Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 01-09-00269-CV

    OPINIONAppellant, Rodney Gordon, appeals from the summary judgment granted by the t ourt in favor of appellee, West Houston Trees, Ltd. In one point of error, Gordon argues that the t