Filter This View

  • June 7, 1999 | Daily Business Review

    Port Funding Probed

    Even as Miami's notorious port corruption trial was sinking Monday, anew criminal investigation by Florida's Office of Statewide Prosecutionwas focusing on suspected fraud in a $200 million seaport

    1 minute read

  • October 24, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Clawback Controversy Now Clouding Dewey Bankruptcy

    This story was originally published by The Am Law Daily.The fight over the validity of so-called unfinished business claims in law firm bankruptcies has heated up in courts

    1 minute read

  • 390 West End Associates v. Harel

    Publication Date: 2002-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 5578

    SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Department, November 2001 Milton L. Williams, P.J. Peter Tom Angela M. Mazzarelli Ernst H. Rosenberger Betty

  • August 30, 2013 | Daily Business Review

    Board Of Contributors: Landmark Koontz Case Strengthens Property Owner Rights

    In a major victory for property rights advocates, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 11-1447, has finally concluded a dispute brewing for al

    1 minute read

  • January 31, 2006 | The Recorder

    All Over the Map

    LOS ANGELES � The legal world may be getting flatter, but when it comes to associate salaries, the playing field still isn't level.As firms across the country lift associate salaries,

    1 minute read

  • Qorvis Communications, LLC v. Wilson

    Publication Date: 2008-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-03
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Niemeyer, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for appellant: David Temeles Jr., Bean, Kinney & Korman, Arlington, Va.
    for defendant: Attorney for appellee: Sanford Saunders Jr., Greenberg & Traurig, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 07-1967

    PUBLISHEDArgued: September 25, 2008Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and Richard L. VOORHEES, United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sitting by designat

  • October 24, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Accolades

    Two hundred lawyers representing 40 private firms and corporate law offices were honored earlier this month by MFY Legal Services for their volunteer counsel to indigent

    1 minute read

  • Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-02-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-13
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Newman, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim defendant-appellee: R. Joseph Trojan, Trojan Law Offices, Beverly Hills, Calif.
    for defendant: Attorney for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants: Michael Nicodema, Greenberg Traurig, New York.
    Case Number: 2008-1050

    Published opinionBefore NEWMAN, SCHALL and MOORE, Circuit Judges.This case relates to a covenant not to sue for past infringement, and its effect on jurisdiction of declaratory counterclaims app

  • Daybreak Express Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Co.

    Publication Date: 2011-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-11
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: William J. Boyce Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-09-01032-CV

    Reversed and Rendered and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filedMAJORITY OPINIONIn this subrogation action, Lexington Insurance Co. sued Daybreak Express, Inc. in connection with property dam

  • L'Art de Jewel Ltd. v Hudson Sheraton Corp., LLC

    Publication Date: 2007-12-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1953-1954-1954A

    Tom, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Sweeny, Kavanagh, JJ. 1953-1954-1954A Index 601076/05 016146/06 L'Art de Jewel Ltd., Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v Hudson