Filter This View

  • Winegar v. Martin

    Publication Date: 2010-01-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-21
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Sue Walker Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2-09-019-CV

    OPINIONI. INTRODUCTIONThe primary issue in this appeal is whether a royalty reservation in a deed reserved the grantor's entire 1/3 royalty interest or only a 1/3 of his 1/3 royalty interest, or

  • Building Industry Association of Central California v. County of Stanislaus

    Publication Date: 2010-11-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-29
    Court: C.A. 5th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Offices of Donald B. Mooney, Donald B. Mooney and Marsha A. Burch; Christian C. Scheuring and Jack L. Rice for Interveners and Appellants. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, David P. Lanferman and James G. Higgins for Plaintiff and Respondent. Christopher M. Whitcomb; Cox, Castle & Nicholson and Kenneth B. Bley for National Association of Home Builders as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Matthew D. Zinn and Mary J. Reichert; John P. Doering, County Counsel, and Thomas E. Boze, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Bradford C. O?Brien and Dominique C. Alepin for California Council of Land Trusts as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Karen Johnson-McKewan and Matthew Tolve for The Sierra Club, The Planning and Conservation League and Greenbelt Alliance as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Thomas B. Brown; Hanson Bridgett, Thomas B. Brown and Sophia B. Belloli for The League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.
    Case Number: No. F058826

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14834BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUN

  • Remick v. Manfredy

    Publication Date: 2001-01-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-01-25
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Sloviter, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-1422

    Argued September 13, 2000OPINION OF THE COURTPlaintiff Lloyd Remick, an attorney specializing in sports and entertainment law licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, filed suit

  • Queens County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-03-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Augustus C. AgateSingh v. Baba Makhan Shah Lobana (28914/11)—Case DisposedJustice Pam B. Jackman BrownCosta v.

  • March 27, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Corporate Scorecard 2009 Bankruptcy

    Purchase the electronic version of the

    1 minute read

  • Arreola v. Choudry

    Publication Date: 2008-07-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-14
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Bauer, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-2696

    ARGUED JANUARY 25, 2008Before BAUER, WOOD and EVANS, Circuit Judges.Gilbert Arreola brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison doctor Mohammed Choudry's treatment of h

  • Heishman v. Ayers

    Publication Date: 2010-09-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-08
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Geoffrey Rotwein, San Francisco, California, and Michael Satris (argued), Bolinas, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of California, Dane Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Alice B. Lustre, Deputy Attorney General, and Glenn R. Pruden (argued), Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, California, for the respondent-appellee
    Case Number: No. 07-99016

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11779 HARVEY LEE HEISHMAN, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ROBERT L. AYERS, for California St

  • Grieveson v. Anderson

    Publication Date: 2008-08-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-18
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Kanne, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-4681

    ARGUED SEPTEMBER 21, 2007Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and KANNE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.During Joseph Grieveson's detainment at the Marion County, Indiana, Jail, he allegedly suffered sev

  • November 20, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    9th Circuit Allows Settling Whistleblower Defendant to Sue Third

    Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly reported that Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner Daniel Dunne argued the case for CTI. Although his name appeared on the decisio

    1 minute read

  • January 4, 2005 | Legaltech News

    The Tech Evolution: Change or Die

    As we welcome 2005, our corporate landscape is littered with the remnants of companies (including law firms) that failed to see the future and seize opportunities. It's time to heed their warn

    1 minute read