Filter This View

  • United States v. Castaldi

    Publication Date: 2008-10-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-27
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Flaum, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-3452

    ARGUED SEPTEMBER 5, 2008Before FLAUM, ROVNER, and WILLIAMS,Circuit Judges.Kenneth Castaldi appeals his conviction on thirteen counts of mail fraud and embezzlement from an employee benefits plan

  • High Falls Brewing Co. LLC v. Boston Beer Corp., 10-CV-6100

    Publication Date: 2010-06-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-08
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: Charles Siragusa
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    District Judge Charles J. Siragusa U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For High Falls Brewing Company, LLC: Jerauld E. Brydges, Es

  • Ugur v. 140 Broadway Property LLC, TS-300128-09/KI

    Publication Date: 2010-06-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Civil Court, Kings County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: TS-300128-09/KI

    Judge Carolyn E. Wade KINGS COUNTY Civil Court Attorney for Plaintiff Osman Ugur: David J. DeToffol, Esq., David J. DeToffol, Esq, PC Attorney for Defendants 140

  • Ramirez v Miller

    Publication Date: 2006-05-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ. 8171. Jose Ramirez plf-res, v. Mark Miller def, Napco Security Group and Alarm Lock Systems, I

  • Burkey v. Marberry

    Publication Date: 2009-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-18
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Rendell, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-4782

    PRECEDENTIALArgued on November 20, 2008Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, RENDELL, Circuit Judge, and O'CONNOR,*fn1 Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice.OPINION OF

  • New York County First Department SUPREME COURT — Published in the Law Journal on: November 3, 2011,

    Publication Date: 2011-11-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Eileen BranstenMbia Ins. v. Countrywide Home Loans (602825/08)—Motion Disposed As IndicatedSyncora Guarantee Inc v. Countrywide Home Loans

  • Pricaspian Development Corp. v. Total S.A., 08 Civ. 9724 (WHP)

    Publication Date: 2009-12-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-11-25
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: William Pauley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08 Civ. 9724 (WHP)

    District Judge William H. Pauley U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Counsel for Plaintiff: Daniel Louis Abrams, Esq., Law Office of Daniel L. Abrams, PLLC,

  • PEOPLE v. DAVID BROOKS

    Publication Date: 2002-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Queens County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Friday, February 22, 2002 Supreme Court Queens County CRIMINAL TERM, PART K-2 h5 xmlns="h

  • Commonwealth v. Hodges

    Publication Date: 2002-01-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-03
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Beck, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 3030 EDA 2000

    � 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed after appellant entered his guilty plea. Appellant, Tiarike Hodges, presents the following issue for our review: whether a manifest injustic

  • Commonwealth v. Van Horn

    Publication Date: 2002-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-23
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Stevens, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 403 EDA 2001

    � 1 This is an appeal from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County denying Appellant's first petition filed under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. �� 95