Conventional wisdom says the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is hostile to employment discrimination against plaintiffs, however, the actual truth is the Fifth Circuit is hostile to imprecise arguments, misaligned advocacy and conclusions in lieu of facts. Here are some recent examples of tough love from the Fifth Circuit.
In an age discrimination case involving the Lubbock County Hospital District, Rosemary Salazar worked as a therapist for 27 years before she was fired for performance issues (Salazar v. Lubbock County Hospital District, Dec. 7, 2020). That’s right, nearly three decades of service followed by unceremonious unemployment. Her evidence of age discrimination? Well, she testified that three other long-term employees in her department, all over 60 years of age, were also terminated the same year by the same manager, and she named names. The flaw? Other than her word for it there was no corroboration from hospital records on whether these employees were terminated, why they were terminated or their ages.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]