When we left off last time, we had just walked through Gerry Spence’s masterful closing argument in the famous Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee case and observed how he had drawn the jurors into his performance as full participants. He did this by providing each of them with the building blocks to construct narratives that would justify (again, to each of them) beliefs as to what “really happened” to Karen Silkwood and, moreover, who was responsible. To understand how he did this, let’s consider how narratives are constructed and how they lead us to conclusions.

In “The Sense of an Ending,” Frank Kermode takes the ticking of a clock as a rudimentary, yet pregnant, narrative form:

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]